Chris Corry points out concerns including taxes paid to other jurisdictions, which highlights the difficulty in making an income tax an excise tax that reaches across state lines
Chris Corry
Washington Policy Center
The Department of Revenue held its first public meeting (as required by law) to discuss proposed changes to the capital gains income tax WACs. This change would add a new section, WAC 458-20-301 (rule 301) regarding definitions, deductions, exemptions, and allocations of gains and losses. The Center for Government Reform previously provided an initial review.
The meeting was called to order and facilitated by Michael Hwang, Tax Policy Specialist, and drafter of the proposed rules. The meeting was attended by a variety of parties including local governments, business associations, tax professionals, and the public.
A topic of concern highlighted by the Washington Society of CPAs is capital loss carryovers (something we flagged) and how they impact federal net long-term capital gain in the year per legislative intent in RCW 82.87.040.
Another area of concern regarded taxes paid to other jurisdictions. There is confusion on how to apply this exclusion with how other states apply tax deductions. This issue highlights the difficulty in making an income tax an excise tax that reaches across state lines.
As noted during the meeting, the current rule draft is provided for discussion purposes only. Comments on the initial draft can still be made via email here. The Department will review comments made during this meeting and those emailed to potentially amend Rule 301. They will file the adjusted rule and will hold another public hearing. They noted in the meeting they are trying to have rules completed by October.
You can watch the public hearing here. There was some additional news coverage of the meeting.
Chris Corry is the director of the Center for Government Reform at the Washington Policy Center. He is also a member of the Washington State House of Representatives.
Also read:
- Opinion: Each councilor should vote THEIR independent vote as a representative and in the best interests of the board they are on
Former Councilor Gary Medvigy calls for independence and transparency in Clark County Council votes - Letter: ‘Bend to our will to put light rail into Clark County or we will remove you via backdoor shenanigans’Camas resident Anna Miller criticizes Clark County Council’s actions regarding light rail and outlines paths for public response in a detailed letter to the editor.
- Letter: Is this representative government?Shauna Walters questions Clark County Council’s actions, calling for accountability and voter awareness ahead of local elections.
- Opinion: Checking on area school district’s policies on biological males participating in female sportsDick Rylander gathers Clark County school district responses on male athletes in female sports.
- Letter: ‘We should be ashamed of ourselves’Brush Prairie resident Bob Mattila expresses concerns about societal values in his letter to the editor.
