Chris Corry points out concerns including taxes paid to other jurisdictions, which highlights the difficulty in making an income tax an excise tax that reaches across state lines
Chris Corry
Washington Policy Center
The Department of Revenue held its first public meeting (as required by law) to discuss proposed changes to the capital gains income tax WACs. This change would add a new section, WAC 458-20-301 (rule 301) regarding definitions, deductions, exemptions, and allocations of gains and losses. The Center for Government Reform previously provided an initial review.
The meeting was called to order and facilitated by Michael Hwang, Tax Policy Specialist, and drafter of the proposed rules. The meeting was attended by a variety of parties including local governments, business associations, tax professionals, and the public.
A topic of concern highlighted by the Washington Society of CPAs is capital loss carryovers (something we flagged) and how they impact federal net long-term capital gain in the year per legislative intent in RCW 82.87.040.
Another area of concern regarded taxes paid to other jurisdictions. There is confusion on how to apply this exclusion with how other states apply tax deductions. This issue highlights the difficulty in making an income tax an excise tax that reaches across state lines.
As noted during the meeting, the current rule draft is provided for discussion purposes only. Comments on the initial draft can still be made via email here. The Department will review comments made during this meeting and those emailed to potentially amend Rule 301. They will file the adjusted rule and will hold another public hearing. They noted in the meeting they are trying to have rules completed by October.
You can watch the public hearing here. There was some additional news coverage of the meeting.
Chris Corry is the director of the Center for Government Reform at the Washington Policy Center. He is also a member of the Washington State House of Representatives.
Also read:
- Letter: ‘Immigration’ resolution scheduled for this Wednesday at Clark County Council Meeting
Rob Anderson urges residents to closely watch an upcoming Clark County Council meeting where an immigration-related resolution and proposed rule changes are expected to be discussed. - Opinion: The 1700-square-foot solution to Washington’s housing crisis
An opinion column arguing that Washington’s energy code has driven up housing costs and outlining how HB 2486 aims to limit those impacts for smaller, more affordable homes. - Letter: Public school vision
Clark County resident Larry Roe urges a deeper community discussion about public school priorities, levy funding, and the long-term affordability of education for local families. - Opinion: House Bill 1834 would create a regulatory nightmare and restricts parental control on social media
Mark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 1834 would undermine parental authority and create sweeping regulatory and legal risks under the guise of protecting minors online. - Opinion: HB 2100 – Tax employers for paying people well? It’s for the needy, sorta
Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues House Bill 2100 would raise costs, discourage job growth, and expand state spending power under the banner of helping people in need.
