David Boze of the Washington Policy Center shares an editorial from the Wall Street Journal that provides a ‘scathing analysis’ of Washington’s income tax on capital gains
David Boze
Washington Policy Center
The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board published a scathing analysis of Washington state’s income tax on capital gains (which, through some linguistic ideological twisting, our State Supreme Court opted to call our “excise tax on capital gains”).
They allude to the fact the tax is tied to income but masquerades as a transactional tax because a progressive tax on income would violate the Washington State Constitution, then dig into where the hubris of its creators created a problem for themselves — they tax “transactions” out of state in violation of the Commerce Clause.
The Journal makes short work of the tax’s defenders argument that it is the same as an internet tax and concludes with a warning about the tax both constitutional and practical while quoting WPC’s amicus brief:
This should be enough to sink the tax at the Supreme Court, but also don’t overlook its practical problems. Allowing interstate excise taxes “threatens to wreak havoc on taxpayers and businesses around the country,” as the Washington Policy Center put it in an amicus brief filed Monday. Washington residents already have a headache in figuring out which sales trigger the tax.
Read the full Wall Street Journal editorial here (warning: WSJ has a paywall). If you hit the paywall problem, MSN has reprinted it here.
David Boze is the communications director at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: As more states enact learning choice programs that benefit children, nearly one million families have applied to participateLiv Finne of the Washington Policy Center reports that an exciting opportunity has emerged from the damage inflicted on students from the extended COVID public school shutdowns and school curriculum controversies.
- Opinion: Can we actually stop some dangerous driving?Doug Dahl, the Target Zero manager and communications lead, has a question for Washington drivers.
- POLL: Do you agree with the decision of the jury that Vancouver Police Officer Andrea Mendoza was not guilty of assault?Do you agree with the decision of the jury that Vancouver Police Officer Andrea Mendoza was not guilty of assault?
- Opinion: Gov. Inslee’s latest wasteful EV subsidy is the equivalent of paying $1,125 for a latteTodd Myers of the Washington Policy Center says that we can expect Washington’s elected officials to continue to prioritize politics over the planet.
- Opinion: Not guilty verdict appropriate resolution in case of VPD officerClark County Today Editor Ken Vance offers his praise to the jury in the trial of Vancouver Police Officer Andrea Mendoza.