
A 2025 change to statute unintentionally limited local flexibility and sparked disputes over who gets a seat at the table when major transit decisions are made
Rep. John Ley has introduced legislation to fix a flaw in state law that has created confusion and inequity in how public transportation benefit areas (PTBAs) are governed across Washington state.
A 2025 change to statute unintentionally limited local flexibility and sparked disputes over who gets a seat at the table when major transit decisions are made. House Bill 2226 would correct that problem by providing communities with more flexibility in structuring transit governing boards, ensuring fair and balanced representation that reflects local needs.
The bill is scheduled for a public hearing next week in the House Local Government Committee on Friday, Jan. 30, at 10:30 a.m.
“Public transportation systems are regional by nature, and their governing boards should reflect that reality,” said Ley, R-Vancouver. “This policy is about fairness, balance, and local decision-making. It ensures that no single city can dominate a board and that smaller cities and unincorporated areas are not pushed aside.”
The legislation would update state law to allow more equitable, population-based representation on PTBA governing boards, rather than forcing rigid formulas that don’t work for every region. It clarifies how cities, counties, and unincorporated areas are represented and reinforces safeguards to ensure broad participation from across a service area.
HB 2226 would also create a tailored framework for certain large counties west of the Cascade Mountains that border another state, placing reasonable limits on representation so all communities continue to have a voice. In addition, the bill would preserve the option to include transit-using members on governing boards, ensuring that riders’ perspectives remain part of the decision-making process.
“People who rely on transit deserve to be heard, and communities deserve boards that actually represent them,” Ley said. “This bill strikes that balance.”
Ley pointed out that for nearly four decades in Southwest Washington, the C-TRAN Board composition was split evenly, with three seats to the largest city, three seats shared among small cities, and three seats held by the county, which worked just fine.
The legislation would repeal an outdated and conflicting statute governing PTBA grant eligibility that no longer aligns with current law, thereby eliminating unnecessary confusion for transit agencies. Ley said the changes are especially important as transit agencies work to meet the needs of workers, students, seniors, and families while managing limited resources.
“When the rules are unclear or unfair, agencies end up spending time and money on internal conflicts instead of improving service,” Ley said. “By clarifying the law now, we give transit agencies the stability they need to focus on safety, reliability, and affordability.
“I hope people come to Olympia or share their testimony online to make their voice heard,” concluded Ley.
For those wishing to testify, there are three options: in-person in Olympia, virtually, or provide written testimony.
Information provided by the Washington State House Republicans, houserepublicans.wa.gov
Also read:
- Third Congressional District candidates agree to two televised October debatesJohn Braun accepted two televised debates with Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, set for October 7 on KOIN and October 13 on KATU.
- Charter Review Commission schedules town hall meetings to discuss proposed amendments on the November ballotClark County Charter Review Commission will hold five district town halls to discuss nine proposed ballot amendments.
- Washington Rep. John Ley warns ballooning bridge budget needs reality checkRep. John Ley says the IBR ballooned from a $44M contract to a $13B–$15B project, with phase one still $2.2B short.
- POLL: The IBR project is described as only 30% designed and 30% funded after more than six years of work. How confident are you in the current management of the IBR program?IBR’s cost has climbed from $3.2–$4.8B to $15.2B while the project remains 30% designed and 30% funded.
- New Clark County Poll: Pocketbook issues and taxes top voter concernsA poll of 400 Clark County voters finds 74% say rising costs are more of a concern than a year ago.







