
The complaint argues that HB 1240’s ban on certain types of semi-automatic rifles, pistols and shotguns violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendment
TJ Martinell
The Center Square Washington
A coalition of gun rights advocacy groups and individual citizens have filed a lawsuit against a new Washington state ban on firearms deemed “assault weapons” as soon as the legislation was signed into law by Gov. Jay Inslee.
The complaint filed by the Firearms Policy Coalition and Second Amendment Foundation in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington argues that HB 1240’s ban on certain types of semi-automatic rifles, pistols and shotguns violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendment.
Taking effect the moment it was signed by Inslee on April 25, HB 1240 bans more than 60 semi-automatic rifles along with other semi-automatic rifles based on either length [shorter than 30 inches] or whether it has one or more accessory or feature. Certain types of semi-automatic shotguns and handguns would also be banned. The legislation was proposed by Attorney General Bob Ferguson and sponsored by Rep. Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle.
The lawsuit alleges that by doing so “the State of Washington has criminalized one of the most common and important means by which its citizens can exercise their fundamental right to self-defense.”
The lawsuit cites the recent Bruen decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which overturned a New York State law prohibiting people from carrying firearms outside their home without a license. The majority opinion stated that there were two metrics to apply to a gun law. “Whether modern and historical regulations impose a comparable burden on the right of armed self-defense, and second, whether that regulatory burden is comparably justified.” Another metric was whether the firearm is in common use.
The lawsuit asserts that HB 1240 does that, particularly regarding the AR-15, which it claims is “among the most popular firearms in the nation, and they are owned by millions of Americans.”
Speaking at an April 25 bill signing, Ferguson said that “we are a nation of laws and they [gun rights advocates] have the right to challenge that. We have defended a number of bills. Our record so far is pretty good. We plan to keep that record intact.”
Also signed by Inslee was HB 1143, which requires gun purchasers complete a background check and wait 10 business days after purchase to take ownership of a firearm. The purchaser must also show proof of taking a safety training course.
SB 5078 focuses on the firearms industry by making them legally liability for gun sales if they do not take “reasonable precautions” to ensure they’re not sold to people who are not legally allowed to own them. The bill also prohibits firearm manufacturers from marketing any gun products to minors.
Pedersen said at the April 25 bill signing that if a “manufacturer is going to target youth with a message about how cool it is to go shoot assault weapons, you may have some responsibility the next time there is a mass shooting.”
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- High school sports notes: Seton Catholic earns another Scholastic CupSeton Catholic’s 15 postseason teams and 10 academic state titles powered a third straight Class 1A Scholastic Cup.
- Clark College celebrates the 90th Graduating Class of 2026Clark College’s 90th commencement conferred 2,816 degrees and certificates, a 49% increase over 2025.
- Vancouver Bee Project presents annual Pollinator Festival on Saturday, June 20The 2026 Vancouver Pollinator Festival brings 60+ vendors, speakers, and walking tours to Marshall Park on June 20.
- Letter: I-5 Bridge – Save $billions, reduce congestion and improve safetyCamas resident Douglas Tweet argues eliminating light rail could save $2.5 billion and reduce bridge width by 31 feet.
- Vancouver Police make arrest in shooting investigationLondon Jasiah Walker, 19, of Camas was killed on Creston Avenue; a suspect is now in custody.
- Letter: How do we share a city and foster community when our sincerely held moral frameworks clash so fundamentally?Matson argues Battle Ground’s council lacks the mandate to adjudicate sexual ethics or act as the town’s spiritual leader.
- Letter: When ‘inclusion’ mandates exclusion, sports lose its wayJonathan Hines argues forced Pride jerseys and banned Bible verses reveal a double standard in MLB’s inclusion policies.








