
Before I-594, Washington residents could purchase guns from private sellers without having to go through a background check, as is the case with licensed gun dealers
TJ Martinell
The Center Square Washington
Since voters adopted Initiative 594, or I-594, in 2014 regarding background checks for firearm sales and transfers, only one person in the state’s three largest counties has been charged and convicted of violating the law, and no one at the state level has been charged or convicted.
Before I-594, Washington residents could purchase guns from private sellers without having to go through a background check, as is the case with licensed gun dealers. The initiative applied the same standard to private sales, so all firearms sold and purchased must be done through a federally-licensed firearms dealer. Exemptions are made for law enforcement, inherited firearms, and temporary “transfers,” such as while hunting or at a gun range.
The initiative makes it a gross misdemeanor for a first offense for either selling or purchasing a firearm without a background check and a class C felony for each subsequent offense. Gross misdemeanors are prosecuted either in municipal court or county district court.
According to public records requests made by The Center Square to the prosecuting offices for Washington state and King, Snohomish, and Pierce counties, only a single person in King County was charged. The King County Prosecutor’s Office charged Gavin S. Rushing in April 2017 of two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm in the second degree and failure to comply with an order to surrender firearms due to a court order.
However, the charges were amended in February 2018 to include a violation of I-594 for trying to buy or sell a Ruger 44 handgun and a Savage Arms rifle to a non-licensed individual.
The unlawful possession charges were dismissed, but Rushing pled guilty to other charges, including violating I-594.
The Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, which compiles annual crime reports, does not specifically track violations of I-594. The Washington State Association of Municipal Attorneys did not respond to request for comment on city attorneys’ prosecution of I-594 violations.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Opinion: CCT editor provides another history lesson on funding public schoolsVancouver schools face $20-30 million cuts while teacher salaries have skyrocketed since McCleary ruling.
- Trump backs John Braun to unseat Marie Gluesenkamp Perez in US House raceState Senate minority leader John Braun secured Trump’s backing to challenge the Democratic congresswoman in 2026.
- Opinion: if you’re a Trump-hating liberal, feel free to pay the old, higher tax rates todayLars Larson challenges Trump-hating liberals to voluntarily pay the higher tax rates Harris proposed.
- VFD welcomes new Engine 5 with traditional ‘Push-In’ Ceremony at Station 5KME-manufactured Engine 5 brings advanced technology and modern safety systems to Vancouver’s emergency response fleet.
- Expect delays on I-5 in Clark County for guardrail repairs April 16WSDOT crews will close the left lane of southbound I-5 between Exit 11 and Northeast 179th Street from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.
- Increasing interest in motorcycle riding means increasing risks for inexperienced ridersWSP launches early safety campaign as fatality rates for motorcyclists reach 27 times higher than car occupants.
- County’s Commission on Aging continues discussion on mobility at April meetingFour-part mobility series brings aging experts together for public discussion on transportation solutions.








