On Jan. 29, the legislation passed the House on a 92-4 vote. It passed the Senate on a 48-1 vote on Feb. 6
Brett Davis
The Center Square Washington
Washington state Gov. Jay Inslee on Wednesday morning signed into law a bill that tightens fuel tax enforcement and closes revenue gaps.
“This is our first bill of the session,” the governor said at the Olympia signing ceremony for Engrossed House Bill 1964, which targets a specific loophole – that is, the fuel tax is included in the price of gasoline paid by the person filling up. “It passed in an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote, which is always a good way to start things off.”
On Jan. 29, the legislation passed the House on a 92-4 vote. It passed the Senate on a 48-1 vote on Feb. 6.
EHB 1964 empowers the Department of Licensing to track and investigate any potential fuel tax and registration violations via the creation of a dedicated “fuel tax discovery team.”
“This bill requires DOL to establish a team that will investigate fuel tax violators and provides them with the authority to assess civil violations,” Inslee said. “Fuel tax reports submitted to DOL will be exempt from public disclosure to protect taxpayer information.”
The governor made a point of noting this is not a tax hike.
“This does not increase any tax; it just makes sure that people are abiding with [what] almost all Washingtonians do, which is to pay their taxes as appropriate,” Inslee said.
Rep. Bill Ramos, D-Issaquah, the primary sponsor of HB 1964, addressed some of the confusion regarding the collection of fuel taxes during floor remarks on House passage of the legislation last month.
“People don’t realize how our fuel taxes are collected,” he said at the time. “Most people think we pay them at the pump individually, but in truth, they’re collected further up the chain. And the folks picking up fuel from the refineries, they’re responsible for paying those. They’re incorporated into the price of fuel and everybody does pay at the pump, but it is incorporated into the price, not collected there.”
According to the legislation’s fiscal note, EHB 1964 is expected to bring in approximately $16 million per biennium.
The fiscal note also estimates operating expenses of $1.63 million for the current 2023-25 biennium and $2.24 million each for the 2025-27 and 2027-29 biennia.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- POLL: Should councilors serving on boards be required to vote the way the full council decides?
A new poll asks whether Clark County councilors serving on boards should be required to vote in line with the full council’s position or retain independent judgment. - Ninth Circuit revives claims against prosecutor who personally swore to warrant affidavit containing alleged false statements
The Ninth Circuit ruled that prosecutorial immunity does not apply when a prosecutor personally swears to alleged false statements used to obtain an arrest warrant. - VIDEO: Washington lawmakers clash over bills directed at limiting ICE officers
A heated House committee hearing on legislation aimed at limiting ICE officers in Washington was temporarily recessed after sharp exchanges between lawmakers over testimony and procedural disputes. - Stung by a court ruling, WA looks to clarify what is an ‘election’
Washington lawmakers are moving to clarify the legal definition of an election after a court overturned a felony conviction for voting in both Washington and Oregon on the same day. - Opinion: Olympia wants a 4-day work week. It won’t work out as the politicians think it will
Mark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 2611’s proposed 32-hour workweek would raise costs, strain small businesses, and undermine Washington’s economic competitiveness. - Republicans celebrate school choice in US Senate hearing, while Dems question fairness
Republicans and Democrats clashed during a U.S. Senate hearing over school choice, with supporters praising expanded options for families and critics warning the policies could deepen inequities in public education. - Opinion: The many reminders not to speed
Doug Dahl examines the many technological and policy-based reminders aimed at reducing speeding and explains why most drivers still choose not to use them voluntarily.
Is it me, or does it seem like every time I turn around there is another announcement of how the State of Wash. is doing something that will bring in x-amount of millions (or billions) of dollars, representing a new income stream? Be it a new tax, or a new enforcement agency, or the settlement of a lawsuit?
This State appears to be – literally – swimming in money. So why are my taxes going up and up and up? And why are high-value people leaving Washington? And why can’t we at least get our roads fixed? And why is it, tell me once again, that we have so many homeless and unhoused veterans?
This state’s leadership is a complete s***show.