
On Jan. 29, the legislation passed the House on a 92-4 vote. It passed the Senate on a 48-1 vote on Feb. 6
Brett Davis
The Center Square Washington
Washington state Gov. Jay Inslee on Wednesday morning signed into law a bill that tightens fuel tax enforcement and closes revenue gaps.
“This is our first bill of the session,” the governor said at the Olympia signing ceremony for Engrossed House Bill 1964, which targets a specific loophole – that is, the fuel tax is included in the price of gasoline paid by the person filling up. “It passed in an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote, which is always a good way to start things off.”
On Jan. 29, the legislation passed the House on a 92-4 vote. It passed the Senate on a 48-1 vote on Feb. 6.
EHB 1964 empowers the Department of Licensing to track and investigate any potential fuel tax and registration violations via the creation of a dedicated “fuel tax discovery team.”
“This bill requires DOL to establish a team that will investigate fuel tax violators and provides them with the authority to assess civil violations,” Inslee said. “Fuel tax reports submitted to DOL will be exempt from public disclosure to protect taxpayer information.”
The governor made a point of noting this is not a tax hike.
“This does not increase any tax; it just makes sure that people are abiding with [what] almost all Washingtonians do, which is to pay their taxes as appropriate,” Inslee said.
Rep. Bill Ramos, D-Issaquah, the primary sponsor of HB 1964, addressed some of the confusion regarding the collection of fuel taxes during floor remarks on House passage of the legislation last month.
“People don’t realize how our fuel taxes are collected,” he said at the time. “Most people think we pay them at the pump individually, but in truth, they’re collected further up the chain. And the folks picking up fuel from the refineries, they’re responsible for paying those. They’re incorporated into the price of fuel and everybody does pay at the pump, but it is incorporated into the price, not collected there.”
According to the legislation’s fiscal note, EHB 1964 is expected to bring in approximately $16 million per biennium.
The fiscal note also estimates operating expenses of $1.63 million for the current 2023-25 biennium and $2.24 million each for the 2025-27 and 2027-29 biennia.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Clark College officially opens Advanced Manufacturing Center in RidgefieldClark College marked the official opening of its Advanced Manufacturing Center in Ridgefield, a new facility focused on training students for careers in advanced manufacturing.
- POLL: With updated estimates reaching as high as $17.7 billion, what should happen to the I-5 Bridge replacement project?A new poll asks readers how the I-5 Bridge replacement project should proceed amid higher cost estimates and questions about transparency within the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program.
- Letter: ‘Walz’s tough talk is a blatant attempt to deflect his complicity in the massive fraud in his state’Camas resident Anna Miller argues that a governor has no legal authority to deploy the National Guard to interfere with federal law enforcement and criticizes Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz’s public statements.
- VIDEO: Reykdal tells school districts to ‘abide by the law’ on trans athletesState Superintendent Chris Reykdal said Washington school districts must follow state law on transgender athletes as citizen initiatives and related Supreme Court cases move forward.
- County seeks community needs survey responses from residentsClark County Community Services is collecting survey responses from residents living on limited incomes to inform its required Community Needs Assessment and guide funding priorities for anti-poverty services.
- Opinion: Not a Good choiceLars Larson argues that personal choices led to a deadly confrontation with law enforcement during an ICE operation in Minneapolis.
- County Charter Review Commission to hold first two meetings in JanuaryThe Clark County Charter Review Commission will meet twice in January to begin reviewing the county’s charter and consider whether to recommend amendments for voter approval.








