
If passed, Proposition 1 would increase levy rate from $0.27 per $1,000 of assessed property to $0.50 per $1,000
Ken Vance, editor
Clark County Today
A proposition on the Aug. 5 special election ballot that will allow Fort Vancouver Regional Libraries (FVRL) to conduct a levy lid lift appears to be passing in the first election results released Tuesday evening.
Voting in the four counties impacted – Clark, Cowlitz, Klickitat and Skamania – show the proposition passing with 52.84 percent (42,987) of the votes in favor compared to 47.16 percent (38,372) opposed.
Passage of the proposition will allow FVRL to raise its levy for the first time in 15 years, according to Director Jennifer Giltrop. The current levy rate is $0.27 per $1,000 of assessed value. That will raise to $0.50 per $1,000 of assessed value if the proposition is approved by voters.
In an interview published by Clark County Today in July, Giltrop told Clark County resident Dick Rylander:
“FVRL, like all library districts in WA (RCW 27.12) is funded primarily by property taxes,’’ Giltrop said. “ Property taxes represent 96% of our revenue. As a junior taxing district, FVRL may not increase the total levy amount collected from current assessed valuation by more than 1% annually or the rate of inflation, whichever is lower. FVRL last sought a levy lid lift in August 2010, and received approval to restore funding back to $0.50/$1,000 of assessed value. On Aug., 5, 2010, FVRL again is asking voters to restore its levy rate back to $0.50/$1,000 of assessed value. In the fifteen years since the last levy lid lift was approved, inflation has risen by 43%. FVRL is operating at a $4.7 million budgeted deficit this year, with a projected $7.6 million deficit in 2026. In 2026, FVRL would not be able to sustain that level of deficit, and therefore a reduction in services will be necessary should the levy vote fail on August 5.’’
Giltrop also stated, “FVRL is operating at a $4.7 million budgeted deficit this year, with a projected $7.6 million deficit in 2026. In 2026, FVRL would not be able to sustain that level of deficit, and therefore a reduction in services will be necessary should the levy vote fail on Aug. 5. Between inflation and increased demand on services, and maintenance of our facilities, the Levy Lid Lift is essential for sustaining and growing with the District we serve.’’
Election results will continue to be updated throughout the week.
Also read:
- Washington governor talks potential return of SuperSonics with NBA commissionerGov. Bob Ferguson spoke with NBA Commissioner Adam Silver about the possibility of bringing the Seattle SuperSonics back as the league weighs future expansion decisions.
- Opinion: The income tax proposal has arrivedRyan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that a proposed Washington income tax creates a new revenue stream rather than delivering tax reform or relief.
- Is it time to lower the legal limit for blood alcohol content to 0.05 in the state of Washington?Mothers Against Drunk Driving and families affected by impaired driving are urging Washington lawmakers to lower the legal BAC limit to 0.05, citing prevention data and personal testimony from Clark County residents.
- Expert in homebuilding has several tips on how to make housing affordableVeteran homebuilder Tracy Doriot shares his perspective on why regulations, taxes, labor shortages, and permitting delays are driving housing costs higher in Clark County and across Washington.
- POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs.








I’d like to know what the library system has done to reduce it’s budget shortfall before coming to the tax payers asking for more. Between the outrageous gas taxes imposed by our Governor, increasing utility costs, and general inflation over the past 5-6 years, etc I’d like to know where the library thinks taxpayers are going get another $200-600 per year to fund their levy? I have had to make adjustments and cuts in my personal operating budget to align with my salary. Maybe government entities need to start doing the same. Taxpayers DO NOT have an endless supply of money to fund government’s every whim and desire.
And one more thing regarding the levy…this is what happens when people don’t care enough to educate themselves or bother to cast their vote. Thank you for taking more money out of my pocket.
I too wondered why 78% of voters reportedly didn’t submit a ballot.Everyone is affected.Be they renter,owner or library supporter.People are quick to complain about
unaffordable housing but I suppose “too busy” to check a block,sign and send in a postage paid vote….puzzling….
Boy, you’ve got that right!
Approx. 22% (or similar) voted. There was a majority of 52.8% that voted for the levy increase. This means that about 12% of all eligible voters have dictated to me a property tax increase of about $104.00 per year. Screw the library; they new exactly which election to go to when asking for an 85% library-tax increase.
They couldn’t ask for a modest increase. Instead, they want a “cadillac” increase to add staff, add bookmobiles, and build new libraries…. while the rest of us are trying to figure out if we buy groceries or pay the electric or put gas in the car this week.
Sorry, FVRL, but you’ve now lost my 15 yrs.+ support!
Truth
Only 22 percent turnout.meaning 4 out of 5 potentisl.voters will see prooerrybtaxes rise and theyvdid not even vote.sadcstarement
The timing of the levy is critical. Entities put up a levy when it’s summer vacation time, knowing full well it wouldn’t pass in the general election. That’s how this passed.
Well, you don’t get the government you deserve, you get the government you elect…. The low voter turn out shows that most eligible voters simply don’t care.
Ridiculous that the Library cannot manage within their Budget like all the citizens! Seriously show me where you have adujusted your budget! With the County growth, why is there a deficit…