
An in-depth look at the two levy requests put before voters by the Washougal School District
Editor’s note: Former Clark County Councilor and long-time Clark County resident Dick Rylander conducts a great deal of research on public education in the area, region and state and shares his findings on his blog, swweducation.org. Rylander recently compiled in-depth analysis on the levy requests on the Feb. 14 special election ballot from the Vancouver, Washougal and Woodland school districts. Here is the information he has gathered on the two levy requests made by the Washougal School District.

Washougal School District has two (2) items on the February 14 special election ballot. The first is a new Enhanced Operations Levy and the other is a new Capital Levy for Technology, Health and Safety.
In this article, we’ll share links to the Clark County Elections Department, the Washougal School District and provide some analysis to try and clear up any gray areas. If you don’t want to click the links and do a deep dive we’ll share the essentials below. Let’s get started.
Clark County Elections Dept link: EP&O Levy statement (Proposition 10): https://clark.wa.gov/sites/default/files/media/document/2022-12/Washougal%20School%20District%20No.%20112-6%20-%20Resolution%20No.%202022-23-03%20%28Proposition%20No.%2010%29_0.pdf
Clark County Elections Dept link: Technology, health and safety Capital Levy (Proposition 11) – https://clark.wa.gov/sites/default/files/media/document/2022-12/Washougal%20School%20District%20No.%20112-6%20-%20Resolution%20No.%202022-23-04%20%28Proposition%20No.%2011%29_0.pdf
Washougal School District website: http://www.washougal.k12.wa.us/district-budget-information/levy/
Clark County Elections Voters pamphlet (online version): https://clark.wa.gov/sites/default/files/media/document/2022-12/Washougal%20School%20District%20No.%20112-6%20-%20Prop%20No.%2010%20-%20Replacement%20Educational%20Programs%20and%20Operations%20%26%20Prop%20No.%2011%20-%20Replacement%20Capital%20Levy%20for%20Educational%20Tech%2C%20Health%20and%20Safety%20Imp%20%20.pdf
So let’s get to the essentials in case you don’t want to work through all the links.
There are two propositions: 10 and 11. Following is the essential info on each:
Proposition 10: Enhanced Operations Levy



Discussion:
- We all understand the need for money to stay even with inflation. We all understand the need to support students with good tools.
- We all want the very best for our children. We love great teachers.
- They want you to focus on the “rate” per $1000 of assessed value which is a red herring. You need to focus on the amount of money they are asking for. If your property value goes up the “rate” goes down but the amount of money collected stays the same. If your property value drops the “rate” goes up but the amount collected stays the same. They want to use a magician’s trick and direct your attention in one area while the sleight of hand is done.
- Test scores are poor: 46.7% are failing ELA (English Language Arts); 62.7% are failing math and 52.9% are failing science. For all the money you give them the scores continue to fall…why throw more good money after bad?
- Student population has fallen 6.1% in the past 3 years.
- The amount spent per student has doubled in the last 10 years. The average across the State is approaching $20,000 per student.
- Over 52% of your current property taxes go to schools…how much more is needed and what will the outcomes you can measure be?

Proposition 11



Discussion:
- This “capital levy” is a 246% increase
- You are being asked to approve two (2) levy’s totalling over $40 million. Rather than ask 1x they split to make it appear the amounts are smaller.
- See the comments above
Summary:
- The real questions?
- Can you afford to pay more?
- Are you getting the results you expect and should from all the money spent?
Here are links to other articles about the WSD:
Other data and information sources:
Also read:
- Opinion: A year in review of news stories from a former sports guyClark County Today reporter Paul Valencia reflects on his evolving role, revisiting major news, community debates, sports moments, and human-interest stories that shaped Clark County in 2025.
- Names released of person killed and Vancouver officers involved in deadly force incidentState investigators have released the names of the Vancouver police officers involved in a deadly force incident, and the Clark County Medical Examiner has identified the man who was killed as 44-year-old Perry J. Sellars of Vancouver.
- These new laws and taxes take effect in Washington state on Jan. 1Several new laws and tax increases passed in 2025 take effect Jan. 1 in Washington, impacting unemployment benefits, business taxes, transportation fees, consumer costs and regulatory requirements.
- Opinion: Ready for another pay decrease from the state? It happens Jan. 1Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues that Washington’s Paid Family and Medical Leave payroll tax increase will further reduce workers’ take-home pay beginning Jan. 1.
- Vancouver rolls out new all-access community center membershipThe city of Vancouver is launching a new all-access membership in January that allows residents to use both Firstenburg and Marshall community centers.
- Four Western WA counties granted $6.6M in federal funds for road safety programsFour Western Washington counties will receive $6.6 million in federal funding for road safety projects, including an EMS pilot program in Clark County.
- Opinion: Justice for none – Court hands down a mandate without a dime to fund itNancy Churchill argues that a Washington Supreme Court ruling on public defense imposes costly mandates on local governments without providing funding to implement them.








