‘The entire ordeal was surreal and, frankly, disturbing’
Bob Unruh
WND News Center
A columnist has reported at the Washington Times that Facebook called “Jesus” hate speech and said it was censoring the reference.
The stunning report comes from Billy Hallowell, an interviewer for Faithwire and CBN News and a co-host of “Quick Start Podcast.”
He writes at the Times that he was taken aback recently when Facebook sent him a notice that, “Your post goes against our Community Standards on hate speech.”
He doubled-checked the social media giant’s wild claim and found it was referring to his explanation of the Christian message of salvation documented by the story of the Resurrection.
What he said his offending post was, “Jesus died so you could live.”
“It was a message I recalled posting early last month in an effort to summarize the central message of the Gospel: Jesus’ sacrificial death for mankind and his ushering in of hope and salvation. The message is essentially New Testament 101,” he wrote.
“Though some might disagree with the proclamation, there’s certainly nothing about the wording that any rational person would call ‘hate speech,'” he said.
Then, he said, Facebook doubled down.
“Facebook proceeded to declare that its ‘community standards’ are meant to ensure everyone feels ‘safe, respected and welcome,’ though, in those moments of confusion over the hate speech flag, I didn’t feel any of those sentiments,” he wrote. “An ominous line about future infractions was included in the warning. It read, ‘If your content goes against our Community Standards again, your account may be restricted or disabled.'”
Ultimately, Facebook sent a follow-up that confirmed, “We have removed your post from Facebook” because the post was in violation.
Hallowell wrote, “The entire ordeal was surreal and, frankly, disturbing. I’m not at all interested in purporting to be a victim, but as an advocate of free speech and religious freedom, the idea that a message as innocuous as ‘Jesus died so you could live’ would be censored or banned is patently bizarre.”
And he noted Facebook has refused to respond to further inquiries.
It might have been an error, he confirmed.
“Of course, if this wasn’t an error, there’s a much bigger problem brewing at Facebook. It’s worth noting that the original post from April 2 was still up and active even after the warning and claim of removal, adding even more questions into the mix.”
Also read:
- Opinion: Where do we go from here at Ridgefield School District?When it comes to the Ridgefield School District bond proposal, Heidi Pozzo believes the message should be clear: people are unhappy their perspective is not being heard and considered.
- Clock running on gathering signatures on three new initiatives to people of WashingtonBackers of three new initiatives to the people of Washington state have around eleven weeks to gather signatures, if they hope to qualify for the November ballot.
- Letter: Officer Mendoza stood up for public safetyClark County Public Safety Alliance Co-Founder Ann Donnelly provides context of support for Officer Andrea Mendoza.
- Juvenile arrested for felony assault of motherOn Thursday at about 8:48 a.m., Battle Ground Police Department officers were dispatched to an active assault with a weapon in the 1600 block of SW 4th Street in Battle Ground.
- Vancouver Fire responds to porch fireAt 10:20 a.m. on Friday, the Vancouver Fire Department was dispatched to 7319 NE 110th Ave. in Vancouver. First-arriving units found a back porch fire on a single-story house.
- Vancouver Fire responds to apartment building fireAt 2:02 a.m. on Friday (April 19), the Vancouver Fire Department was dispatched to the report of a fire at 306 NE 104th Ave in Maple Ridge Apartments.
- Clark County Sheriff’s Office releases critical incident video from 4/13/2024Following a deputy-involved shooting, the Clark County Sheriff’s Office, at the discretion of the sheriff, will release body-worn camera videos of the incident.