Election investigator wins lawsuit over 120,000 missing voters

American voters soon may be getting an answer to what happened to the 120,000 people in Pennsylvania who allegedly voted in the 2020 election, but now cannot be found.

Far fewer people registered to vote in one state than there were ballots counted

Bob Unruh
WND News Center

American voters soon may be getting an answer to what happened to the 120,000 people in Pennsylvania who allegedly voted in the 2020 election, but now cannot be found.

The Thomas More Society explained that’s because a judge has ordered the Lycoming County Office of Voter Services to provide investigator Heather Honey with a digital copy of the cast vote record file.

That will have to include every precinct tabulator and central tabulator used in the 2020 election.

The fight developed because she experience anomalies while voting, and sought to find out what was going on.

Her “documented evidence showing that Pennsylvania’s 2020 general election results show that there were 120,000 less voters registered to vote in Pennsylvania than there were ballots counted,” the legal team explained.

“That’s 120,000 votes that cannot be legally attached to an actual voter,” said Thomas More Society special counsel Tom Breth.

The legal team said Honey has told the story of standing in line with her son, a newly registered voter at the time, to cast their ballots in the 2020 presidential general election.

“She related how an elder couple in line before them stepped up to vote. The man’s name was checked off on the numbered voter list and his ballot prepared, but his wife was told she could not vote as she had already voted via mail. The couple both insisted that the woman had not voted by mail, but she was only allowed to cast a provisional ballot without any assurance that her vote would be counted,” the team explained.

The disturbing incident piqued Honey’s curiosity. As an open-source investigator, she decided to apply those skills to determine how frequently that type of situation occurred, the legal team said.

Breth said, “The more that Ms. Honey learned, the more she came to believe that the Pennsylvania Department of State was giving guidance to election officials that was based on political reasons rather than the law. Honey observed that any activities that were purported to determine accuracy in the voting process were not based on Pennsylvania law, leading one to believe that these officials either don’t know what the law is, or they feel like they don’t have to follow it.”

The court ruling found that the Lycoming County cast vote record is not excepted from public access, as it is not “the contents of ballot boxes [or] voting machines” and ordered Lycoming County Voter Services to provide Honey with a printed copy of the cast vote record from the Lycoming County 2020 General Election.

Officials earlier had denied her requests for access to the election information.


Also read:

Receive comment notifications
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Margaret
Margaret
1 month ago

Clark County, WA has not provided the public records requested of the Cast Vote Records, CVR, data used in elections. A detailed explanation of CVR data and is importance to the public is reported at Washington State Elections FIASCO . See summary of the article below.
WE NEED TO SEE THE CAST VOTE RECORDS
What are Cast Vote Records (CVRs) and why are they so important? The CVR is a report generated by the actual voting machines that shows the cumulative votes, and how they add up in series. They are several different types of CVRs that record many specifications for multiple variables in an election. They are digital records of all the votes for candidates and measures for all the ballots cast in an election. For the purpose of this report, I am referring to the type of CVR that shows lists, rows and columns in a spreadsheet format. It shows the unidentified voter selections that were tabulated on one combined record. They are NOT ballots and are NOT ballot images. They are interpretated data sets of what the voter put on the ballot. They are listed in order by time of vote cast during the entire election. Here is an example of a CVR.
According to The National Institute of Standards and Technology – NIST Special Publication 1500-103

  • * Simply put, a cast vote record (CVR) is an electronic record of a voter’s ballot selections, and its primary purpose is to provide a record of voter selections that can be counted in an efficient manner to produce election results.
  • * CVRs get created by the batch fed scanners used to scan our mail-in ballots.
  • * To produce a CVR, the scanner must interpret the voter’s selections according to the rules of each contest to determine which selections can be counted.

We have been asking most all WA State counties for CVRs for the past year and a half. The SOS is telling the counties to not give CVRs, saying it violates WAC 434-261-114 and White v. Skagit and Island / Clark County Court Cases…

1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
buy viagra online where can i buy viagra