
While other states are lowering taxes, Majority Leader Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon throws cold water on the idea of broad-based tax relief this year in Washington
Brett Davis
The Center Square Washington
Democrat Majority Leader Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon, D-Seattle, threw cold water on the idea of broad-based tax relief – a cut in sales or property taxes – coming out of this year’s Washington State Legislature.
Meanwhile, people in other states are seeing lower taxes. Ten states reduced individual income tax rates for 2023, according to the Tax Foundation. New Hampshire lowered its rate only on interest and dividends income.
Fitzgibbon said his caucus is open to more targeted tax relief for the people of Washington.
“If we do end up in a place where we think we can meet the needs of the people of our state…and we have the resources to lower taxes for people, I think we really want to target that tax cut to the people who are in the most need, who are having the hardest time meeting the basic needs of their household,” Fitzgibbon told host Austin Jenkins on Thursday’s episode of TVW’s “Inside Olympia.”
He explained his party’s opposition to broad-based tax cuts.
“I don’t think that we want to do broad-based cuts that accrue tax benefits to the wealthiest who don’t need that benefit,” Fitzgibbon said. “So that’s why I think the Working Families Tax Credit is probably the mechanism that our caucus would support if providing cash to people in response to rising costs is something that we do at the end of the day.”
The Working Families Tax Credit will distribute up to $1,200 to those who qualify. Applications open Feb. 1.
Legislation expanding the pool of those eligible for the tax credit or increasing the rebate are possibilities this session, Fitzgibbon added.
“But we want to be sure we’re not providing a tax cut before we know that kids in special education in our public schools are getting the support that they need from educators,” he said.
Jenkins pointed out that Republicans say Democrats’ characterization of the state’s portion of the sales tax as regressive in nature means Democrats should support a tax cut that would benefit those most burdened by the tax.
Fitzgibbon responded by saying Democrats want to prioritize issues such as homelessness, behavioral health disorders, and food and rental assistance.
He then circled back to the rich.
“We also have a lot of really wealthy people in our state, and I think while we are grateful for their contributions to our state budget, there’s still sales tax paid by the wealthiest people in our state when they, you know, buy a new jet ski, and I think we just want to be sure we’re not prioritizing cuts to sales tax for things like that ahead of K-12 education or higher education or the behavioral health system,” Fitzgibbon said.
House Republican Leader Rep. J.T. Wilcox, R-Yelm, responded to Democrats’ lack of enthusiasm for broad-based tax relief by bringing up the majority party’s opposition to a cut in the state’s portion of the property tax.
“I would say if you keep talking about how horribly regressive the property tax is, it’s really hard to make the point that reducing the property tax isn’t a progressive move,” he told Jenkins during a later appearance on the same episode of the “Inside Olympia” program. “It just doesn’t make sense to me.”
Wilcox noted Republicans have worked with Democrats on targeted tax relief before.
“And we have certainly, I think, joined many times in targeted tax relief through the B&O tax system,” he said.
Last year lawmakers passed and Gov. Jay Inslee signed into law legislation eliminating the business and occupation tax for businesses making less than $125,000 in gross receipts. The law went into effect at the beginning of this year.
In 2021, lawmakers approved funding for the Working Families Tax Credit – 13 years after it was initially passed.
“And certainly the fact that the Republican budget finally gave the impetus to finance the Working Families Tax Credit shows that we’re absolutely down for that as well,” Wilcox said.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- No longer a coach, Rory Rosenbach makes triumphant return to McKenzie StadiumFormer Union football coach Rory Rosenbach is now the athletic director at Glacier Peak, and on Friday the Grizzlies from Snohomish visited Vancouver to take on Evergreen at McKenzie Stadium.
- All happy and healthy after baby is delivered on side of I-205Brianna Kelly asked her husband to pull over because there was no time left anymore, so Justin, along with the help of a 9-1-1 dispatcher, delivered baby Aria on the side of I-205 last month.
- WA Attorney General: $42 million recovered from fraudulent unemployment claimsAn innovative legal effort has enabled Washington to recover $42 million originally paid out in fraudulent unemployment claims during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Over one-third of Democrats believe Americans have ‘too much freedom’Just over one-third of Democratic voters think Americans are too free, according to a poll released on Friday by RealClearPolitics.
- County parks beginning tree health and maintenance project at Pacific Community ParkThe Parks and Lands division of Clark County Public Works is beginning a project to improve tree health and address hazardous trees at Pacific Community Park.
- Harvest time in kitchen garden at Clark College’s McClaskey Culinary InstituteThe kitchen garden that wraps around three sides of the Tod and Maxine McClaskey Culinary Institute at Clark College is reaping a bountiful, colorful harvest for students to use in their recipes.
- Vancouver fire marshal lifts city’s recreational burning banDue to recent rains and anticipated cooler weather conditions, Vancouver Fire Marshal Heidi Scarpelli has lifted the recreational burning ban within the city of Vancouver, effective at 12:01 a.m. Saturday.
This is another example of why I’ve nearly given up on participaton in the legislative process. I’ve written & communicated with SW Washington elected officials for the past several years. And though I often get well-meaning and thoughtful responses, the end result is always the same… it’s the democrats’ way or the highway.
The majority leader quoted in this article flat out says there will be no broad-based tax relief. Despite there being a surplus in the budget, or despite there being valid arguments otherwise, there will be no tax relief because the democrat majority says so. There is absolutely no middle-ground here in Wash. State. None whatsoever.
How about a smaller-than-desired tax reduction in property taxes? Maybe that reduction could sunset in a specified time frame? Maybe there could be a one-time rebate check sent to property owners? Maybe seniors 65+ could have property taxes frozen for a period of time, with forgiveness of the increases that occur in the interim? But, no, the democrats’ way of thinking is simply “no tax reductions, only increases.”
Why would any person or business, if given a choice, ever choose to come to Wash. State?