
The initiative would let parents opt their children out of assignments related to the students’ sexual experiences or the family’s religious or political beliefs
Carleen Johnson
The Center Square Washington
One of three citizen initiatives passed by the Washington State Legislature as the session winds down is Initiative 2081, known as the “parents’ bill of rights,” that would require school materials – textbooks, curriculum, a child’s medical records – to be easily available for parents to review. The initiative would also let parents opt their children out of assignments related to the students’ sexual experiences or the family’s religious or political beliefs.
On Monday, I-2081 passed the House of Representatives on a vote of 82-15 and the Senate on a vote of 49-0. Once passed by the House and Senate, initiatives become law and do not require action by the governor.
Floor speeches from both chambers of the Legislature highlighted a distinct divide between Democrats and Republicans on implementation of I-2081, which will go into effect 90 days from Thursday, the last day of the legislative session.
Majority party Democrats argued I-2081 essentially makes no changes to current policy.
“I am comfortable moving this forward today because I do believe that it doesn’t change any protections for our young people,” Sen. Claire Wilson, D-Federal Way, said.
She noted LGBTQ youth and those who identify as gender expansive will not lose any of their rights.
“We will be keeping our eyes on implementation so that we can come back immediately should interpretation by districts cause any harm to young people,” she said.
Sen. Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle, said much the same thing.
“I was comforted to hear that school districts plan to implement the initiative narrowly,” he noted.
Some groups that support LGBTQ youth have indicated they will be keeping an eye on the impact of the legislation to make sure school districts don’t violate the privacy or other rights of students.
Republican state representative and state GOP Chairman Jim Walsh, who wrote the initiative, has a different take.
“The pressure will almost certainly be on the parent to ask, but yes the schools are supposed to inform,” the Aberdeen lawmaker told The Center Square.
I-2081 empowers parents to know they have the authority to ask and receive any information about their child, Walsh noted, “even if it’s something from the doctor’s office or clinic, the school can’t say no.”
He added, “We are rectifying lack of clarity at the state level with this initiative.”
The initiative goes much further than that, according to Liv Finne, education director at the Washington Policy Center think tank, who listened to what Democrats had to say during floor debate.
Democrats are trying to minimize what I-2081 actually does, she said.
“This initiative goes right at the heart of what parents are upset about in this state, and that is that schools have been actively hiding from parents what is happening to their children,” Finne explained.
That doesn’t sit well with many parents.
“Changing names of children, pronouns and other aspects of their children’s lives that parents have an absolute right to know – this is what the initiative is about,” Finne said. “Schools have no right to hide from parents if their child is trying to change their name at school or change their gender or some such craziness. That is now no longer permitted under the law.”
Lawmakers claiming I-2081 doesn’t change anything “were simply not telling the truth, and schools will be obligated to provide parents notification if a child is asking about something so fundamental as gender or sexuality issues, that is clear.”
Regarding legal recourse parents may have under the newly-passed initiative, Finne has this counsel: “Parents in this situation have the legal recourse of filing a lawsuit against their local school district under I-2081’s requirement that schools notify parents about information about their child.”
Finne says schools are relying on Policy 3211, an administrative rule, regarding gender-inclusive schools, which is not consistent with I-2081.
Paul Guppy, WPC’s vice president for research, in an email to The Center Square, outlined some recourses for parents under I-2081: “1. They can go public. In other words they can go on Facebook and tell the public that their local public school is not telling them what is happening to their own child. Now they can point to the plain language of the I-2081 law just passed by the state legislature.
“2. They can pull their children out of the public schools, like 46,000 families have already.
“3. Majority Democrats now govern the schools. Parents can vote for lawmakers who do not believe in dividing children from their parents.”
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Speculation on Seahawks’ sale heats up following proposed WA ‘jock tax’Speculation about a potential Seahawks sale has intensified amid debate over a proposed Washington income tax that would apply to high-earning athletes and performers.
- Gov. Ferguson rejects WA lawmakers’ initial crack at income tax legislationGov. Bob Ferguson said he cannot support the Legislature’s initial income tax proposal, arguing it fails to return enough revenue to Washington residents for tax relief.
- Opinion: Washington’s proposed income tax – driving businesses and jobs out of the stateMark Harmsworth argues that Washington’s proposed income tax would undermine the state’s economy by driving businesses, investment, and jobs elsewhere.
- House Environment and Energy Committee unanimously approves legislation from Rep. John LeyThe House Environment and Energy Committee unanimously advanced Rep. John Ley’s bill updating regulations on naturally occurring fibrous silicate materials used in construction.
- Mitchell Kelly announces candidacy for Clark County auditorMitchell Kelly announced his candidacy for Clark County auditor, citing nearly a decade of experience in the Auditor’s Office and a focus on election integrity and financial transparency.
- Opinion: Let’s use the truancy laws to send a message to schoolsLars Larson argues that truancy laws should be enforced when schools allow or encourage students to miss class for political protests.
- Opinion: WA GOP state representative asking Trump Administration to investigate fraud allegationsBill Bruch argues that state and federal authorities should investigate alleged fraud and accountability failures in Washington’s taxpayer-subsidized childcare programs.








