A multitude of factors contributed to this policy decision
After careful consideration, the city of Battle Ground announces the suspension of the Battle Ground Police Department’s (BGPD) Canine (K9) program, effective March 1, 2023.
A multitude of factors contributed to this policy decision, including a thorough evaluation of current and future staffing needs, a review of K9 deployment statistics within city limits, and considering recent police reform laws.
Staffing needs
Consistent with the city’s Guiding Principles, public safety tops the list of priorities for BGPD. Police officers are the primary resource BGPD relies upon to achieve this priority, and despite ongoing recruitment efforts, BGPD continues to experience a shortage of patrol officers. This challenge is not unique to our community, as law enforcement agencies across the nation report a significant reduction in the number of applicants. In addition, the extensive pre-employment evaluation process necessary to identify qualified officer candidates often results in disqualification or withdrawal, further reducing the pool of potential officers.
In light of these staffing limitations, BGPD patrol officers often work additional shifts. “I want our officers to be safe, and to have the capacity to continue to devote significant time to 9-1-1 and 3-1-1 calls,” said Chief Mike Fort. “To that end, the reassignment of the K9 officer to patrol will help the Department better meet the needs of our community.”
K9 deployment within city limits
Approximately 80 percent of all Battle Ground K9 Unit deployments that occurred in 2022, took place outside of Battle Ground. This is an important factor contributing to the policy decision, particularly in consideration of BGPD’s need to allocate limited resources to meet its obligations to our residents, businesses, and visitors.
BGPD is fortunate to have strong regional partnerships that provide mutual aid law enforcement assistance. These partnerships are particularly important among smaller agencies that can share resources, including K9 services, from time-to-time as needs dictate.
Changes in policing
The police reform laws that swept the nation in 2021 have changed many aspects of policing in the State of Washington. Legislators and voters have made it clear that policing, particularly as it relates to the use of force, must be thoughtful and forward-thinking. These goals are shared by BGPD.
“To me, this means rethinking some tools of traditional policing, including the use of K9s,” said Chief Fort. “Although the K9 is a valuable resource in some cases, I believe there are perhaps other methods such as technology and training that offer better paths forward for our department.”
The Battle Ground Police Department remains committed to providing quality law enforcement service through techniques that emphasize sound tactics and advancements in service methods, while still remaining fiscally responsible to our taxpayers. To learn more about this and other Battle Ground Police Department policies and programs, please visit us online at www.cityofbg.org.
Information provided by city of Battle Ground.
Also read:
- Signatures filed for initiatives on parental rights, blocking trans athletes from girls’ sports
Supporters of two initiatives on parental rights and transgender participation in girls’ sports filed signatures Friday, moving the measures closer to consideration by Washington lawmakers. - Vancouver Police investigate shooting
Vancouver Police are investigating a fatal shooting reported early Jan. 3 outside the Off-Ramp Sports Bar on Northeast 112th Avenue. - Vancouver Police release critical incident video from Dec. 28 officer-involved shooting
Vancouver Police Department released a Critical Incident Video related to a December 28 officer-involved shooting while the Office of Independent Investigations continues its review. - Opinion: Transit agencies need accountability not increased state subsidy
Charles Prestrud argues that Washington transit agencies face rising costs and declining ridership due to governance structures that lack public accountability. - Letter: ‘For years, American foreign policy too often felt like a blank check’
Vancouver resident Peter Bracchi argues that the 2025 National Security Strategy marks a long-overdue shift toward clearer priorities, shared responsibility, and interest-based American leadership. - POLL: Are you better off than you were a year ago?
This week’s poll asks readers to reflect on their personal financial situation and whether they feel better off than they were a year ago as economic conditions continue to shift. - Opinion: Does tailgating cause speeding?
Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl examines whether tailgating contributes to speeding and explains why following too closely increases crash risk with little benefit.
“… the extensive pre-employment evaluation process necessary to identify qualified officer candidates often results in disqualification or withdrawal, further reducing the pool of potential officers. Good grief, what does the evaluation process entail that record numbers of people can’t pass these days?
This really makes me sad. Our world has gone completely nuts on being softy soft to criminals. K9s are absolutely fearless and when you have someone who is not responding to ‘technology and training’ , the dog will make them understand. Hug a thug doesn’t work. Its absolutely insane where this is all going. Hope those who want this are ready for the result.
This is by far one of the worst decisions the city could have made! A highly trained officer and a highly trained K9 just cut when it’s all been paid for, by the taxpayers no less. That’s not fiscally responsible at all Chief!
The reasons given seem suspect and don’t come close to justifying the elimination of such a program. These dogs are a major asset and are far better than any technology you can dream up. The use of the dogs also result in less force, or no force used at all. Seems to be a better way to keep up with the state’s goals.
Perhaps you can’t get good officers because you eliminate valuable programs, make poor decisions and waste voters money?