
House Bill 1240 creating a state definition of ‘assault weapon,’ which the Gun Owners of America, or GOA, says would apply to most firearms
TJ Martinell
The Center Square Washington
The Washington Senate Law & Justice Committee is scheduled to vote next week on House Bill 1240 creating a state definition of “assault weapon,” which the Gun Owners of America, or GOA, says would apply to most firearms.
One of the reasons is due to the definition of assault weapons in the bill. Although the bill specifically lists 62 rifles by name “regardless of which company produced and manufactured the firearm,” the ban also applies to any semi-automatic rifle with a barrel length less than 30 inches. The gun barrel is the section of a firearm between the action and the muzzle.
Because of this and other firearm restrictions in the bill, GOA Regional Director Monte Bowen told The Center Square that an estimated 90% of firearms would be illegal to sell and purchase. Due to the bill’s grandfather clause, it would also be eventually illegal to own them.
“The bottom story is they don’t want guns in the state of Washington,” he said. “Their whole motive is to disarm everybody from any weapon they want to have.”
The bill’s intent language states that all weapons that fall underneath the definition of “assault weapons” are “like M-16s, thus are ‘weapons most useful in military service.’”
Speaking on March 8 during debate over HB 1240, Rep. Joel McEntire, R-Cathlamet said to colleagues on the House floor “what does it mean to be ‘like’ an M-16?” A military veteran, McEntire added that “there’s nothing in here that gives a strict definition. It is a rat’s nest of interpretation.”
Bowen said that “the thing people don’t realize is…the real definition of an assault in the military is a fully automatic weapon. We can’t even own those weapons, but their law [HB 1240] goes into so much more. The way they wrote it up, it even gets into commonly used hunting rifles. Most hunting rifles, most of your sporting rifles are 26 inches [barrel length] and down.”
According to Rifle Shooter magazine, most rifles are between 21-24 inches, and anything longer than 26 inches is “uncommon.”
The bill’s definition of “assault weapon” includes rifles with the capacity to use a magazine with 10 or more rounds, regardless of caliber size. HB 1240 also prohibits pistols with a threaded barrel that allows for the use of a suppressor, also regardless of caliber size.
The bill’s intent section states that “assault weapons are not commonly used in self-defense and that any proliferation is not the result of the assault weapon being well-suited for self-defense, hunting, or sporting purposes.”
However, Rep. Dan Griffey, R-Allyn, told colleagues during the March 8 House floor debate that statement “is factually inaccurate. They’re very used in sporting activities. Many of the weapons on that list are very well suited as hunting rifles.”
While the bill’s intent section says that “gun violence is a threat to the public health and safety of Washingtonians,” rifles are used in a fraction of murders in Washington state. According to data from the Washington Association for Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, between 2015-2021 there were 1,593 murders. Of those, just 20 or 1% were committed with a rifle. Fists and feet were used to kill 108 or 6.7% of victims. The most used weapon was a handgun, which was used in 415 or 28% of murders.
On average, almost half (48%) of murders occurred at a residence, and 61% of victims were known by the perpetrator.
The proposed law would also prohibit a wide variety of gun accessories, including a thumbhole stock, an open section of a rifle butt that allows the user better grip.
Other accessories prohibited include:
- Folding stock
- Recoil compensator
- A shroud to shield the user’s hand from barrel heat
- A grip that is “conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon.”
“The Supreme Court is going to have to pull the trigger and make an example,” Bowen said.
The state Senate Law & Justice Committee is scheduled to vote on the bill on March 23.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Letter: ‘One year later, a withheld text message points to perjury’Clark County resident Rob Anderson argues a previously undisclosed text message tied to a C-TRAN board dispute raises questions about sworn statements and public meeting rules.
- Opinion: It’s not just the increased taxes that are driving businesses awayMark Harmsworth of the Washington Policy Center argues taxes, workforce challenges and economic uncertainty are driving businesses to relocate outside Washington.
- Opinion: There is no such thing as a ‘free’ lunch, and an income tax isn’t more palatable because it offers oneElizabeth New of the Washington Policy Center argues the proposed Washington income tax and universal school meals policy reflect a broader state spending problem
- Battle Ground the site of Busy Bee Craft Fair March 21Battle Ground will host the Busy Bee Craft Fair on March 21, bringing dozens of local artisans and crafters together for a free community event at the Battle Ground Event Center.
- State of the City: Vancouver mayor promotes arts and culture in her annual addressVancouver Mayor Anne McEnerny-Ogle highlighted arts initiatives, public safety investments and city development projects during her annual State of the City address.
- Clark College to present Choral ConcertsClark College choirs will perform two winter concerts in Vancouver this week, featuring the Treble Ensemble, Chorale and Concert Choir under the direction of Dr. Jacob Funk.
- VIDEO: WA House pulls an all-nighter as income tax debate continuesWashington House lawmakers debated Senate Bill 6346 through the night as Republicans proposed amendments and raised concerns about economic impacts and constitutional questions.








