The discussion will include topics such as an overview of the Public Safety Sales Tax, estimated revenues, information regarding body cameras and alternatives to incarceration
VANCOUVER – The Clark County Council approved placing a Public Safety Sales Tax on the August primary ballot. If approved by the voters, sales tax in Clark County would increase by one-tenth of 1 percent, or one penny for every $10 spent. The tax will be used to fund law and justice expenses, including, but not limited to, body worn and dash camera programs, staffing for the Sheriff’s Office needed for jail bed expansion and other expenses.
A public conversation on the measure is scheduled for 4:30 p.m. Thu., June 23. The event will air on CVTV channel 23/323 and www.cvtv.org. Residents also can join the hybrid meeting via phone and online by following the instructions on the county’s website. For those wishing to attend in person, the meeting will be in the sixth-floor hearing room in the Public Service Center at 1300 Franklin St.
County staff, leaders and members of the law and justice community, including the Sheriff, Superior Court and District Court Judges will attend the event. The discussion will include topics such as an overview of the Public Safety Sales Tax, estimated revenues, information regarding body cameras and alternatives to incarceration.
Community members with specific questions about the sales tax are encouraged to email Rebecca Messinger at Rebecca.messinger@clark.wa.gov.
There may be an opportunity for some questions to be discussed during the event, and written responses will be provided to those who submitted questions.
Information provided by Clark Co. WA Communications.
Also read:
- Jail disturbance leads to arson charges
Two inmates set fire to items within their unit. - Vancouver Fire HazMat team assists with chemical mixtureThe Vancouver Fire Department (VFD) responded to the scene of a chemical mixture incident Tuesday.
- National organization of physicians supports lawsuit against FDA for interfering with the treatment of patients with COVID-19The battle over proper treatment for COVID-19 and the security of the doctor-patient relationship continued on Sept. 30 as the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) filed a motion and amicus brief in support of the physicians who sued the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) earlier this year.
- House GOP warning: Biden illegally using tax money to boost Dem votesThe midterm elections are just weeks away, when control of the U.S. House and Senate will be decided, and possibly the future of many of Joe Biden’s more extreme agendas, and warnings are being issued that he – and leftists in the nonprofit world – may use tax dollars or tax-exempt funding to boost his party’s turnout.
- Class of 1993 celebrates the new Mountain View High SchoolMountain View High School Class of 1993 gets an early reunion to tour the new school and experience Friday Night Lights once again at McKenzie Stadium.
- Opinion: Secretly negotiated state government pay raises to cost taxpayers more than $1 billionJason Mercier of the Washington Policy Center offers an update of what the government employee unions describe as the ‘largest compensation package’ in history.
- Evergreen High School teacher earns $100,000 prize for school’s skilled trade programBill Culver, a skilled trade teacher at Evergreen High School, was surprised at a ceremony Tuesday morning when he was named a grand prize winner for the Harbor Freight Tools for Schools program, earning his skilled trade program $100,000
I guess I don’t understand… the tax is to be used for body- and dash-cams. Yet, it is readily admitted that the proposed tax (1/10 of 1 percent) exceeds the projected costs. So why isn’t the proposal for, say, 1/12 of 1 percent? Why can’t the proposal be fine-tuned to address the specific need?
As it now stands, it seems to be yet another request by the County to “give us more and more of your money; we’ll figure out a way to spend it.”
For me, the current proposal results in my giving the County money for the cams AND some extra money for the County to play with, as they desire.
Don’t know about you, but my property assessment arrived last week and I’m looking at an additional $600-$700 next year. This kind of tax-increase must be reined in. I’ll be needing to cut money elsewhere from my budget in order to pay taxes. What has the County done to cut wasteful spending? Yet the County is asking for even more!?!?
I’m a NO vote, as it is presently proposed, for purely financial reasons. I agree that cams are needed, but I’m against the current proposal.
Body cameras and dash cameras are a must, but they MUST do it within their already excessive budget. If that means cutting other programs that are unnecessary than that’s a win-win.