
House Bill 1880 would eliminate the five-year rolling timeline for architecture applicants to successfully pass each section of their examination for registration
The process for people seeking to pursue an architectural career in Washington could be simplified if a bill from Rep. Stephanie McClintock becomes law. House Bill 1880 would eliminate the five-year rolling timeline for architecture applicants to successfully pass each section of their examination for registration. The bill unanimously passed out of the House Consumer Protection and Business Committee today.
“The National Council of Architectural Registration Board has found that this outdated policy disproportionately impacts women and candidates of color,” said McClintock, R-Vancouver. “It has created an undue burden for people who are having children. It has also hurt those military members who must request special consideration to get extensions on the rolling clocks. It’s time to remove this timeline and make the architectural licensing process less burdensome.”
Under current law, to qualify for registration as an architect in Washington, an applicant must be of good moral character, be at least 18 years of age, and must pass the required examination.
The Washington State Board for Architects Board is responsible for determining the examination’s scope, content, and grading process, which must be held at least annually. Applicants who fail to pass any section of the examination are permitted to retake the failed parts.
However, applicants have only five years from the date of the first passed examination section to pass all remaining sections. If the entire examination is not successfully completed within the five years, then any sections passed more than five years prior must be retaken.
If an applicant fails to pass all remaining sections within the initial five-year period, the applicant is given a new five-year period from the date of the second oldest passed section. All sections must be passed within a single five-year period for the applicant to pass the examination successfully.
“This change makes perfect sense, and it will eliminate unnecessary pressure on those individuals who want to pursue a career in architecture in Washington,” said McClintock. “Hopefully, this will help people move forward in their career goals.”
Under House Bill 1880, with the five-year rolling period removed, architectural applicants would be permitted to retake any failed sections of the examination as the Board prescribes.
The 2024 legislative session began on Jan. 8 and is scheduled to run 60 days.
Information provided by Washington State House Republicans, houserepublicans.wa.gov
Also read:
- High school state basketball: Columbia River suffers heartache in overtime loss in semifinalsColumbia River’s run to the Class 2A semifinals ended on a buzzer-beater in overtime, while Evergreen advanced to a trophy game and several other Clark County teams wrapped up their state tournament seasons.
- Passage of income tax bill more likely as Gov. Ferguson now says he will sign itGov. Bob Ferguson says he will sign a revised income tax proposal targeting earnings above $1 million if the Legislature approves the measure.
- Opinion: Many important decisions looming as the 2026 session nears the endRep. John Ley outlines budget concerns, energy policy debates and several tax proposals as the 2026 legislative session approaches its final days.
- Opinion: 106 striking workers already using unemployment insurance benefitsA Washington Policy Center analyst says the state’s new law allowing striking workers to collect unemployment benefits is already affecting the UI system.
- Pro basketball: Vancouver Bears set to debut new name in new leagueVancouver’s professional basketball franchise has rebranded as the Vancouver Bears and will open its season in a new league March 7 at Hudson’s Bay High School.
- State basketball quarterfinals: Columbia River Rapids keep dream alive, advance to final fourColumbia River defeated Pullman in the Class 2A state tournament quarterfinals in Yakima to reach the semifinals, while four other Clark County teams fell in their respective state quarterfinal games.
- POLL: Who should have the primary say in decisions about a student’s gender identity at school?Clark County Today is asking readers who should have the primary role in decisions about a student’s gender identity at school.








