Lars Larson comments on the Democrat Party’s approach to elections
Lars Larson
The Northwest Nonsense
I guess you could call the Democrat Party’s approach to elections, back to the future.
Fraud in elections was a big problem about 180 years ago. States held the Presidential election on various dates spanning more than a month.
That meant early voting influenced voting in other states. Sound familiar?
So Congress passed a law in 1845 specifying one day every four years for the Presidential election.
Now, vote by mail has recreated the problem. Ballots go out three weeks before election today and some states count them up to a week AFTER election day.
Oregon began allowing late ballots only 3 years ago.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments about whether it’s constitutional to count late ballots.
Democrats love the idea and Republicans don’t.
After oral arguments yesterday, it sounds like the majority of Justices on the court don’t agree with late voting.
I figure when the Supreme Court strikes down late voting … well, let’s say Democrats will be ALMOST as mad as they were when President Lincoln took away their slaves.
Also read:
- VIDEO: Vote-by-mail rules in WA at risk in SCOTUS election law case
More than 127,000 Washington ballots postmarked by Election Day but received after could be disqualified under a possible Supreme Court ruling, prompting debate from both parties. - Rounding out debate, Gov. Ferguson signs bill addressing retailers’ penny problem
A new Washington law lets merchants round cash purchases to the nearest 5 cents, aiming to manage change as shortages of pennies affect both businesses and customers. - Opinion: Voting with the Democrat Party – Back to the future!
Lars Larson connects the history of election rules to today’s debates, highlighting Supreme Court concerns over counting ballots after Election Day. - Michelle Belkot fired up over judge’s decision to dismiss her case against Clark County Council
A federal judge dismissed Michelle Belkot’s claims that the Clark County Council violated her rights and public meeting laws by removing her from the C-TRAN Board after she opposed light rail funding. - Vancouver city leaders appreciate the feedback at Monday’s community forum
Guests filled six tables as Vancouver officials listened to conversations sparked by structured questions touching on connection, barriers, and belonging.
