Charter Review Commission candidate John Jay continues his series of letters to the editor
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
To the People of Clark County:
From the more general inquiries pursued in the last two papers on Home Rule and our first County Charter Review’s Amendments, we now move on to a specific examination of the various departments of our county government. We shall begin with the Legislative Branch, whose power is largely vested in the County Council.
The Council consists of five part-time members, each elected to four-year terms by their respective districts in both the primary and general elections. This marks a shift from the previous commissioner model, in which candidates were nominated by district but elected at-large by the entire county in the general election.
At its first annual meeting, the Council elects one of its members to serve as chair. The chair is responsible for conducting meetings, acting as the county’s spokesperson, representing the county in intergovernmental and ceremonial settings, and overseeing constituent communications on behalf of the Council. A vice-chair is also elected to serve in the chair’s absence. Councilors are then appointed to represent the county on various boards and commissions, such as C-TRAN, that require Council representation.
The Charter grants the Council significant powers, including the ability to levy taxes, appropriate funds, and adopt the county budget — functions similar to Congress’s “power of the purse.” The Council also adopts comprehensive plans and land-use codes, conducts public hearings, approves collective bargaining agreements, confirms or rejects appointments forwarded by the County Manager, and nominates members to bodies such as the Planning Commission.
The charter is almost self-conscious in its wording regarding the powers of the legislative branch, as though it is acutely aware of how much it stands in contrast to the American political traditions when it comes to establishing the powers of a legislative branch of government. Whereas the U.S. Constitution confidently opens with, “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress…”, the Clark County Charter states, “The legislative power of the county not reserved by the people or executive branch shall be vested in a county council.” Right out the gate, the charter undercuts the Council and makes it clear that the branches of our county government are not co-equal. Further, the charter states that the Council shall be the “policy-determining” body, as opposed to the “policy-making” body, which essentially means that the executive branch proposes and the Council reacts.
The charter continues to undermine the legislative branch as it outlines the council’s relationship with the other branches. Councilors are prohibited from interfering with the administration of the executive branch and may not issue orders or directions to county staff. The charter does go through great pains to make it clear that Councilors are not prohibited from making requests referring a citizens complaint, initiate an investigation, or request information but making a request is hardly a concrete enumerated power to access information and investigate.
Adding to this structural disadvantage is the part-time nature of the Council and its lack of dedicated staff. How can five part-time legislators without research support or reliable access to information serve as an effective check on six full-time elected executives, an appointed County Manager, and over 1,500 county employees? And how can working citizens reasonably serve when Council meetings are scheduled for weekday mornings?
These issues must be front and center in our next County Charter Review Commission. The current structure leaves our legislative branch underpowered, underresourced, and structurally subordinate. If we want real checks and balances in our county government, we must start by addressing this imbalance.
John Jay, candidate
Clark County Charter Review Commission
Also read:
- GoFundMe Spotlight: Vancouver man raising money to buy warm clothing for the homeless
Vancouver resident Cameron Murray is raising money through GoFundMe to purchase jackets and socks for the homeless, inspired by the life and struggles of his late brother Shelby. - Residents encouraged to reduce holiday waste by recycling natural Christmas trees
Clark County residents have multiple options to recycle natural Christmas trees after the holidays, helping reduce landfill waste and create reusable mulch. - County Elections Office closed Dec. 24-25
The Clark County Elections Office will be closed Dec. 24 and Dec. 25 and will reopen Dec. 26 with regular business hours. - Opinion: The unpreferred and unaffordable Interstate Bridge replacement proposal
Rep. John Ley argues that the Interstate Bridge Replacement proposal is unpreferred, unaffordable, and failing to address congestion, cost transparency, and community concerns. - POLL: If project costs continue to rise, what should lawmakers do with the I-5 Bridge replacement plan?
This poll asks readers what lawmakers should do with the I-5 Bridge replacement plan as costs rise and key decisions remain unresolved. - Clark County mourns loss of hometown hero and humanitarian Greg Biffle
Clark County is mourning Greg Biffle, the Camas High School graduate and NASCAR champion remembered not only for his racing career but for his humanitarian work and disaster relief efforts. - Opinion: IBR still holding and lying about coming billions in cost overruns
Joe Cortright argues that Interstate Bridge Replacement officials are deliberately delaying the release of an updated cost estimate that he says could push the project toward $10 billion.
wpDiscuz
