Charles Prestrud of the Washington Policy Center believes the budget shows little progress on the reforms to planning and prioritization that are desperately needed

Charles Prestrud
Washington Policy Center

Last week (May 16) Gov. Jay Inslee signed the State Transportation budget for the 2023-2025 biennium. The budget bill, HB 1125, runs to two hundred sixty-three pages and includes hundreds of line items. Following are a few highlights and items of interest:

• The legislature funded most of the highway projects that had been pushed out of the Governor’s budget proposal. That is a positive step because the state population continues to grow, traffic volumes have rebounded after the pandemic, and additional highway capacity is needed. It’s also good because it re-affirmed the State’s commitment to projects that had been funded in the legislature’s previous transportation packages. 
• The transportation budget does not include additional bonding. That was a prudent decision because in past budgets the legislature tended to bond heavily against future revenue from gas tax increases. The need to service that accumulated debt limits budget flexibility and makes it harder for WSDOT to find the funding needed for highway preservation and maintenance. More bonded debt would have made the future transportation budget situation even worse.   
• The legislature increased funding for highway preservation and maintenance but not enough for WSDOT to get caught up on their backlog. Eventually we will pay a price for deferring projects (highway condition will deteriorate and the needed repairs won’t get cheaper).
• The legislature was far too generous with transit and non-core transportation programs. Hundreds of millions of dollars will be doled out to transit agencies and cities without adequate oversight or performance monitoring. The state auditor does routine checks to verify funds are spent and financial controls are followed, but what they won’t do is look at whether the projects made any sense or whether they actually produce the desired benefits. For example, many projects funded in recent years by the State’s Regional Mobility Grant program would have a hard time passing a benefit/cost test. 
• There is considerable doubt WSDOT will be able to complete all the highway projects funded in the transportation budget on the desired timeline. The combination of staff vacancies and an increasingly bureaucratic planning process will make it difficult for WSDOT to move all the projects through to completion on schedule. Cost-overruns due to an unfavorable bid climate and inflation can also be expected. 
• The failure of the mileage tax/road user fee bill (HB 1832) was a good thing, as was Governor Inslee’s veto of the bill that would have established a process for reporting how many miles individuals drive (HB 1736, the odometer bill). But the underlying issues have not gone away and an array of interest groups can be expected to push for a mileage tax in future sessions.  
• HB 1846, which directs WSF to proceed with procurement of new ferries, is a step in the right direction. However, the bill still requires hybrid-electric propulsion, which will make the new ferries more expensive and may lengthen the timeline for completion. Further delay in acquiring new ferries would make it even more difficult for WSF to fully restore service to pre-COVID levels. For instance, service to Sidney B.C. may not resume until 2030. The bill takes the positive step of opening the process to out-of-state shipyards, but the bill was amended to give a 13% price preference to in-state shipyards, which means the playing field still isn’t quite level.   

So, a few bright spots, but the big picture shows little progress on the reforms to planning and prioritization that are desperately needed, nor much attention to system capacity needs or agency accountability. So, despite the large increases in transportation spending the legislature has passed in recent sessions, serious issues remain for future legislature’s to resolve.  

Charles Prestrud is the director of the Coles Center for Transportation at the Washington Policy Center.

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: Hard work is being done to try to trade one bad health care system for another
  Elizabeth New (Hovde) cautions that efforts to create a universal, taxpayer-financed health care system in Washington risk replacing existing problems with new challenges tied to cost, access, and centralized control.
• 
  Opinion: The progressive attack on Washington’s sheriffs
  Nancy Churchill argues that proposed legislation would shift power over county sheriffs away from voters and concentrate control within state government.
• 
  Letter: Is Secretary of State Hobbs really JUST protecting your voter information?
  Camas resident Rick Vermeers questions the Washington secretary of state’s refusal to provide voter roll data to the U.S. Department of Justice and raises concerns about voter list transparency and compliance with federal law.
• 
  Opinion: In search of joy at Vancouver Mall during Christmas time
  Paul Valencia reflects on his annual Christmas-time visit to Vancouver Mall, finding nostalgia, people-watching, and moments of joy amid last-minute holiday shopping.
• 
  Opinion: Atmospheric River events mean even less clearance for vessels crossing under the proposed Interstate Bridge Plan
  Neighbors for a Better Crossing argues that high river levels from atmospheric river events further reduce vessel clearance under the proposed Interstate Bridge design, creating long-term navigation risks on the Columbia River.