Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center explains why lawmakers should be interested in repealing both paid family and medical leave and the long-term-care program and payroll tax
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
As expected, a decrease in pay is on the way for most W2 workers. The payroll tax rate for Washington state’s paid family and medical leave is going up to 0.8% in January — a 33 percent increase in the tax rate.
Workers already saw a tax increase for the social program last January when it grew to 0.6% from the 0.4% state lawmakers and the public were sold when the law for paid leave was enacted. The program isn’t paying its way and isn’t expected to in the future. The Employment Security Department said in a mailing to employers, “To keep pace with more people using the program, and as required by law, the premium rate will increase in 2023.”
Add this tax increase to a 0.58%-plus payroll tax promised for a state-mandated long-term-care program that’s on the way in July, and $1.38 of every $100 most people earn will be taken for new social programs that many Washington workers won’t benefit from and that aren’t reserved for low-income workers. In fact, in some cases, low-income workers will be funding paid time off of work for child bonding or family-member care for people who make more money than they do and who might not need taxpayer dollars.
Social program via payroll tax is no way to treat Washington workers: Penalizing work isn’t wise.
Lawmakers should be interested in repealing both paid family and medical leave and the long-term-care program and payroll tax. They aren’t set up for people in need, they have solvency problems and they unfairly take wages from workers who may never need, use or want the program.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Letter: When headlines gaslight the public
Vancouver resident Peter Bracchi argues that emotionally charged immigration headlines blur legal distinctions and mislead the public rather than inform it. - Opinion: California’s unemployment debt crisis mirrors Washington’s Employment Security Department failures
Mark Harmsworth compares California’s growing unemployment insurance debt with Washington’s Employment Security Department failures and argues both states must reform or risk continued economic harm. - Opinion: Hard work is being done to try to trade one bad health care system for another
Elizabeth New (Hovde) cautions that efforts to create a universal, taxpayer-financed health care system in Washington risk replacing existing problems with new challenges tied to cost, access, and centralized control. - Opinion: The progressive attack on Washington’s sheriffs
Nancy Churchill argues that proposed legislation would shift power over county sheriffs away from voters and concentrate control within state government. - Letter: Is Secretary of State Hobbs really JUST protecting your voter information?
Camas resident Rick Vermeers questions the Washington secretary of state’s refusal to provide voter roll data to the U.S. Department of Justice and raises concerns about voter list transparency and compliance with federal law.
