Amendment 26-31 passed 13-1 but may never reach voters if the county council acts first. ...
-
Charter Review Commission 26-31: Establishing a Five-Member Ethics Commission
Charter Review Commission 26-31: Establishing a Five-Member Ethics Commission
-
Charter Review Commission 26-20: Limitation on Consecutive Terms for County Council Members
Charter Review Commission 26-20: Limitation on Consecutive Terms for County Council Members
-
Clark County Charter Review Commission passes 10 amendments to head to general election
Clark County Charter Review Commission passes 10 amendments to head to general election
-
County’s Charter Review Commission seeks public comment on proposed charter amendments
County’s Charter Review Commission seeks public comment on proposed charter amendments
-
CCRW to host dinner event featuring Charter Review Commission members
CCRW to host dinner event featuring Charter Review Commission members
-
County Charter Review Commission sets meeting schedule, selects officers
County Charter Review Commission sets meeting schedule, selects officers
-
Part VI: What principles would you bring to the Charter Review Commission in evaluating which amendments, if any, should be forwarded to the voters?
Part VI: What principles would you bring to the Charter Review Commission in evaluating which amendments, if any, should be forwarded to the voters?
-
Part V: Evaluating amendments to forward to the voters
Part V: Evaluating amendments to forward to the voters
-
Part IV: Powers of initiative and referendum in County Charter
Part IV: Powers of initiative and referendum in County Charter
-
Part III: Charter Review Commission – oversight and accountability
Part III: Charter Review Commission – oversight and accountability
12

