Debate over proposed Rules of Procedure changes raises questions about independence, accountability, and representation on regional boards
The Clark County Council is considering new language in its Rules of Procedure that would require councilors serving on boards and commissions to vote in line with the council’s official position. The discussion follows last year’s removal of Councilor Michelle Belkot from the C-TRAN board after she said she would vote independently on light rail-related costs. Supporters of the proposed changes say they would clarify authority and ensure a unified voice, while critics argue they would undermine independent judgment and voter representation. This poll asks readers where they stand on that question.
More info:
County Council still looking to change language in Rules of Procedure
Clark County Council members continued debating proposed changes to the Rules of Procedure tied to last year’s removal of Michelle Belkot from the C-TRAN board, including...
Read more
Also read:
- POLL: Should councilors serving on boards be required to vote the way the full council decides?
A new poll asks whether Clark County councilors serving on boards should be required to vote in line with the full council’s position or retain independent judgment. - Opinion: Olympia wants a 4-day work week. It won’t work out as the politicians think it will
Mark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 2611’s proposed 32-hour workweek would raise costs, strain small businesses, and undermine Washington’s economic competitiveness. - Opinion: The many reminders not to speed
Doug Dahl examines the many technological and policy-based reminders aimed at reducing speeding and explains why most drivers still choose not to use them voluntarily. - Opinion: Free care for people who don’t live here? It’s being encouraged — HB 2250 can help
Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues that Washington’s current charity care rules encourage out-of-state use of non-emergency hospital services and supports HB 2250 to restore residency-based limits. - Opinion: Update on legislation to restore fairness and local control to transit governing boards and a bill to create accountability for the I-5 Bridge project
Rep. John Ley outlines the status of several bills addressing transit governance, accountability for the Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement Project, criminal sentencing standards, and ongoing state responsibilities in his latest legislative update.
No, they should be required to vote the will of the people. Article 1 of the WA State Constitution says: “All political power is inherent in the people, and governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, and are established to protect and maintain individual rights.” That means, if they know the will of the people then they are bound to vote accordingly. That is what Michelle did. And she was absolutely in the right to do so. The OTHER Councillors were in the wrong to insist that she vote the way THEY wanted her to vote, instead of the people. As a fact, EVERY Council District voted to require a vote of the people before spending money on Light Rail. The other Councillors are in VIOTATION OF THEIR OATH OF OFFICE TO UPHOLD THE WA STATE CONSTITUTION!