Mark Harmsworth of the Washington Policy Center shares an example of how government delays and red tape destroy small businesses
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
Melinda Grenier left her job at Amazon to start her own mobile coffee stand, Hay Girl Coffee, investing about $100,000 in a trailer to kick start her dream. Everything looked like it was going to work, but then the permitting process started with the Snohomish County Health Department, things didn’t go as planned.
The Health Department is 5 months behind on permit applications, the delays caused by staff turnover and an increase in permit applications. Even when things are going well, the agency still can take up to 3 months to get a mobile food permit processed.
In the meantime, mobile food vendors have to apply for temporary permits, which cost thousands of dollars and put huge financial strain on the bottom line.
Lori Johnson, director of the Washington State Food Truck Association emphasizes that unnecessary and costly regulations are overburdening small businesses like Grenier’s and the process needs to be streamlined.
Other states have laws that automatically approve permits if the government takes an unreasonable amount of time to process the permit. While the principal can’t be applied to every permit type, the mobile food permit would be a good candidate for a change in state or municipal law. Since the Health Department issues and charges for temporary permits, at least waving the fees for the temporary permits should be considered when the delay is caused by the government agency.
Government delays and red tape destroy small businesses. As Snohomish County grapples with these challenges, it’s essential to find a balance between regulation and supporting local entrepreneurs.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: The income tax proposal has arrived
Ryan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that a proposed Washington income tax creates a new revenue stream rather than delivering tax reform or relief. - Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district. - POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?
Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs. - Opinion: IBR falsely blaming inflation
Joe Cortright argues that inflation explains only a small portion of the IBR project’s cost increases and that rising consultant and staff expenses are the primary drivers. - Letter: The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $141 million bribe can be better spent on sandwich steel-concrete tubes
Bob Ortblad argues that an immersed tunnel using sandwich steel-concrete tubes would be a more cost-effective alternative to the current Interstate Bridge Replacement Program design.
