Liv Finne says school choice has one goal: to put the learning needs of children over the career desires of adults
Liv Finne
Washington Policy Center
Last week at WPC’s Gala Awards Dinner one of the nearly 1,000 attendees approached me and asked, “Liv, just what is school choice? Won’t it hurt public schools? Are other states using school choice?” These are reasonable questions. I will answer the first one first and tackle the other questions in future blog posts.
School choice is a policy idea for improving children’s access to education. It is entirely voluntary and provides parents with an alternative to a traditional government-run school.
The traditional system gives families little control and provides a “one-size-fits-all” model based on a child’s home address. Many parents like their local public school, but some communities are underserved.
Of course, school choice already exists for people who can afford it. It is called the real estate market. Wealthy families can buy homes in neighborhoods with good schools. Families unable to afford this often find their assigned public school fails to adequately educate students. School choice is the solution to this unfair situation. School choice gives parents their child’s education money directly, usually in the form of a regulated Education Saving Account (ESA), which allows the child access to an alternative school if parents think that is best.
These days, however, even parents in upscale neighborhoods are finding that school administrators often disrespect their religious beliefs and moral values. This creates tension between the political messages children hear at school and the character lessons parents are teaching at home.
School choice expands learning options by giving families control over their child’s public education dollars. Options make learning more inclusive. Educational choices can include private schools, homeschooling, online learning, individual tutors, and special needs services.
The courts have made it clear that because parents direct the spending, choosing a religious school is constitutional, in the same way that federal student aid now goes to religious-based colleges.
School choice programs vary in structure. Some programs give tax credits to organizations that fund scholarships to private schools. Some state programs provide vouchers or a tax-funded ESA.
In other states school choice programs typically provide families with between $4,300 and $8,400 per student per year. Special needs children receive additional public funding, up to $25,000. School choice programs are state-regulated, and all participating schools must be fully accredited.
School choice is popular. Already this year seven states have enacted universal school choice, allowing all students to participate. In all, thirty-two states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia offer some form of educational choice to parents.
Of course, there will always be those who are uncomfortable with change. The hardliners in the current system are particularly vocal, seeing parent choice as a threat to their budgets and careers. But the purpose of public education spending is to educate children, not to serve the financial desires of powerful interests.
School choice has one goal: to put the learning needs of children over the career desires of adults.
Liv Finne is the director of the Center for Education at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: Inviting courts into health care policy discussion
Elizabeth New (Hovde) warns that Senate Joint Resolution 8206 could invite lawsuits by placing vague health care mandates into Washington’s Constitution. - Opinion: 24 States In. Washington Out? $732 Million Lost?
Vicki Murray argues Washington risks forfeiting $732 million in federal education funding if state leaders do not opt into the federal tax-credit scholarship program. - Opinion: Nationwide strike in support of illegals and opposing the rule of law?
Lars Larson argues that a reported nationwide strike reflects opposition to immigration enforcement and the rule of law, criticizing political leaders and media coverage. - POLL: Should councilors serving on boards be required to vote the way the full council decides?
A new poll asks whether Clark County councilors serving on boards should be required to vote in line with the full council’s position or retain independent judgment. - Opinion: Olympia wants a 4-day work week. It won’t work out as the politicians think it will
Mark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 2611’s proposed 32-hour workweek would raise costs, strain small businesses, and undermine Washington’s economic competitiveness.
