
Mark Harmsworth of the Washington Policy Center discusses a recent identity theft that took place at Washington’s Labor and Industry Tukwila facility of hard drives, laptops, cellphones, office equipment, access cards and other items
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
Washington’s Labor and Industry (L&I), reported on April 29 that a theft had occurred at its Tukwila facility of hard drives, laptops, cellphones, office equipment, access cards and other items.

The hard drives held agency files which may have contained the personally identifiable information of people who have had business with the regional office [Tukwila] location including some L&I employees’ dependents’ personal information, according to L&I.
This, again, raises the issue of whether the state has the ability to protect Washington residents’ data appropriately. The breach is the latest in a series of high profile data leaks from state agencies, including the state auditor’s office who is tasked with auditing breaches.
L&I has indicated that the data stolen would not be accessible without considerable effort. This is not the standard that is required to protect data. The industry standard for data protection is an AES-256 encryption algorithm or better.
With today’s technology-based systems, the reality is that no system is 100% safe, but in this case several reasonable steps appear not to have been taken by those handling the data. Similar to the data breach that occurred at WSU in 2017, the data that should have been stored on secure servers was stolen while it was outside of its intended normal use. In the WSU case, a researcher had data stored on a local drive for analysis and did not follow the appropriate data protection procedures.
The government has a lot of very sensitive data concerning Washington residents stored on servers, hard drives and laptops.
Private companies are required to follow laws to protect both the security and the privacy of consumer data and recent proposals such as the Washington Privacy Act should also be applied to state agencies.
It’s time the agencies take the protection of personal data seriously.
For those concerned that their data may have been part of the breach, L&I has set up a call center for more information and steps you can take to protect your accounts and credit. It can be reached on (833) 940-2302.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs.
- Trump Education Department bolsters protections for prayer in schoolsThe U.S. Department of Education issued new guidance reinforcing individual prayer rights in public schools while reiterating limits on school-sponsored religious activity.
- Opinion: IBR falsely blaming inflationJoe Cortright argues that inflation explains only a small portion of the IBR project’s cost increases and that rising consultant and staff expenses are the primary drivers.
- Letter: The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $141 million bribe can be better spent on sandwich steel-concrete tubesBob Ortblad argues that an immersed tunnel using sandwich steel-concrete tubes would be a more cost-effective alternative to the current Interstate Bridge Replacement Program design.
- Opinion: Washingtonians want affordability, not more taxes, according to our recent surveyRep. John Ley shares results from a legislative survey showing affordability concerns and opposition to new taxes among respondents, while outlining Republican priorities in Olympia.
- Washougal City Council appoints David L. Szyplinski to fill Position 5The Washougal City Council appointed David L. Szyplinski to fill the vacant Position 5 seat following the death of longtime council member and former mayor Molly Coston.
- Opinion: Schumer insults black Americans with ‘Jim Crow 2.0’ commentLars Larson argues that Democratic opposition to the SAVE Act contradicts voter support for photo ID requirements and unfairly characterizes minority voters.








