Chris Cargill of the Mountain States Policy Center says Washington lawmakers need to take a look in the mirror
Chris Cargill
Mountain States Policy Center
State legislators in Washington state have a big budget challenge ahead of them. If they want to know why, they should look in the mirror.
When the Evergreen State’s legislative session opens next month, lawmakers will be staring at a massive budget shortfall – a whopping $10-12 billion. And let’s be clear – the gap has nothing whatsoever to do with tax revenue. In fact, tax revenue is growing dramatically.
Instead, the issue is the colossal failure by lawmakers to control spending or prioritize tax relief. The budget chasm Washington finds itself facing is not occurring in neighboring states. For example, the current headlines in Montana and Wyoming are about major tax relief proposals while Idaho lawmakers are discussing even more tax cuts building on the reductions already enacted.
This different fiscal outlook between the states can directly be traced to the contrasting governing philosophies. While policymakers in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming prioritized tax relief and fiscally conservative budgeting over the last several years, Washington lawmakers have been doing their best Thelma and Louise impersonation by stepping on the spending gas. In doing so, they are driving the state over the fiscal cliff.
Consider the fact that even though revenue was growing significantly, Washington lawmakers not only failed to provide any broad-based tax relief but instead accelerated their spending even faster aided by tax increases, including imposing a new capital gains income tax.
Based on the response from legislative leadership, it sounds like Washington policymakers plan to double down on this tax and spend philosophy by imposing even more tax increases in 2025. Consider this report from KING 5 News: “Tax increases, and potentially new tax proposals, will be on the table when Washington state legislators convene in Olympia in January for an historic session.”
Washington’s massive spending increases and lack of tax relief aren’t just a contrast with more fiscally conservative states. Oregon taxpayers are scheduled to receive nearly $1 billion in tax relief and New York’s Democratic Governor is proposing $500 “Inflation Refund” checks for next year. Governor Hochul said, “It’s simple: the cost of living is still too damn high, and New Yorkers deserve a break.” I’m sure that Washingtonians would agree with that sentiment of their taxes being “too damn high” as well.
It is time for Washington policymakers to follow the budget Hippocratic Oath and do no more harm by getting spending under control. One place to start is to learn from the example of former Gov. Christine Gregoire.
Facing a significant budget shortfall in 2008, Gregoire wisely concluded that the pay raises she had agreed to for state employees weren’t “financially feasible.” Realizing that current and outgoing Governor Jay Inslee has already ordered a freeze on hiring, services contracts, goods and equipment purchases, and travel, it’s safe to assume the billions in pay raises he secretly agreed to this summer are also not “financially feasible” either. Right?
Do Washington lawmakers really plan to impose tax increases to provide government pay raises?
Chris Cargill is the president of Mountain States Policy Center, an independent research organization based in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming and Eastern Washington. Online at mountainstatespolicy.org.
Also read:
- Opinion: Supreme Court’s ruling should end state’s bullying of the La Center School District
Ken Vance argues a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on parental rights in education could influence the ongoing dispute between the La Center School District and Washington state officials over gender pronoun policies. - Opinion: Neighbors for a Better Crossing urges Oregon Legislators to demand full audit of IBR project, echoing Washington’s HB 2669
Gary Clark of Neighbors for a Better Crossing urges Oregon lawmakers to pursue an audit of the Interstate Bridge Replacement project similar to Washington’s HB 2669 proposal. - Opinion: Climate Commitment Act – Washington’s hidden carbon tax hits hard
Opinion, columns, Washington state, Climate Commitment Act, CCA Washington, Washington carbon tax debate, Washington gas prices, Nancy Churchill, Dangerous Rhetoric, Washington climate policy, Washington fuel costs, Travis Couture, Washington Department of Ecology, Washington Department of Commerce, Washington carbon credit auctions, Washington cap and trade program, Washington environmental policy - Letter: The Missing Skamania Report – The prosecuting attorney is still sitting on it
Rob Anderson questions why an investigative report into potential County Charter and OPMA violations has not received an outside review after being declined by multiple offices. - Opinion: Washington’s charter schools deliver – if the state lets them
Vicki Murray argues that Washington’s charter schools are posting stronger academic results than comparable peers while facing funding inequities that are shrinking the sector.
