
Chris Corry of the Washington Policy Center shares a humorous example of a Washington excise tax that would violate the US Constitution
Chris Corry
Washington Policy Center
As we previously covered, the Freedom Foundation has appealed the Washington State Supreme Court decision upholding the capital gains excise tax as constitutional.

In the petition, they offer a rather humorous example of a Washington excise tax that would violate the US Constitution:
“If Washington enacted a law imposing an excise tax on all purchases that Washington residents make at Disneyland, including perishable goods consumed in the park and entrance tickets purchased at the gate, all would agree that the law is unconstitutional. After all, no state may directly regulate transactions wholly outside its borders—and that holds true even if one of the transacting parties is a resident of the state or the form the regulation takes is a tax.”
The petition further notes that the Court has applied this consistently for over a century. Thus, the petition argues that these principles alone should have compelled the Washington State Supreme Court to strike the capital gains tax down on the out-of-state sale of out-of-state assets.
Finally, they offer the implications of making this an excise tax, not an income tax:
“Washington has gone to great lengths to make clear that ESSB 5096 is not a tax on the Income derived from the sale of capital assets. That is understandable given the state-law constraints under which Washington must operate. But if Washington prefers to impose excises instead of income taxes, then it must live with the consequences of that choice. And one of those consequences is that it may not impose excise taxes on transactions that occur entirely outside its borders.”
Thus, the churro excise tax would be unconstitutional, much like the Washington State capital gains excise tax.
Chris Corry is the director of the Center for Government Reform at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: A year in review of news stories from a former sports guyClark County Today reporter Paul Valencia reflects on his evolving role, revisiting major news, community debates, sports moments, and human-interest stories that shaped Clark County in 2025.
- Opinion: Ready for another pay decrease from the state? It happens Jan. 1Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues that Washington’s Paid Family and Medical Leave payroll tax increase will further reduce workers’ take-home pay beginning Jan. 1.
- Opinion: Justice for none – Court hands down a mandate without a dime to fund itNancy Churchill argues that a Washington Supreme Court ruling on public defense imposes costly mandates on local governments without providing funding to implement them.
- Letter: When headlines gaslight the publicVancouver resident Peter Bracchi argues that emotionally charged immigration headlines blur legal distinctions and mislead the public rather than inform it.
- Opinion: California’s unemployment debt crisis mirrors Washington’s Employment Security Department failuresMark Harmsworth compares California’s growing unemployment insurance debt with Washington’s Employment Security Department failures and argues both states must reform or risk continued economic harm.







