Elizabeth New (Hovde) points out that many workers don’t benefit at all from the paid family and medical leave fund and are just going without wages they could be using for other life needs
Elizabeth New (Hovde)
Washington Policy Center
“The paid family and medical leave (PFML) premium rate will increase to 0.92% in 2025,” Emily Makings with the Washington Research Council reported Wednesday afternoon. “The Employment Security Department (ESD) made the announcement during today’s meeting of the PFML Advisory Committee.”
The 2025 rate is significantly higher than the rate that accompanied the program when it first began in 2019 at .40%. The fund is not paying its way as Washingtonians were sold.
In addition to a more than doubling of the tax rate, PFML has already received a general fund bailout of $200 million. Short-term deficits in the PFML account beginning early in 2025 and continuing intermittently through 2026 could require another bailout. Lawmakers have also questioned if they set the rate too low for this “if you build it they will come” taxpayer-financed benefit.
Employers and employees pay into this fund that allows workers taxpayer-paid time off with new babies or time off for people with medical needs of their own or others. Employers pay 28.57% of the total PFML tax and employees pay 71.43%. In 2025, employers will pay 28.48% of the premium and employees will pay 71.52%, writes Makings.
Many workers, of course, don’t benefit at all from this fund and are just going without wages they could be using for other life needs. My research has also shown that PFML is no safety net. Middle- and upper-income wage earners use the program more than those with lower incomes. In fact, people making $60 or more an hour used the fund about twice as much as the lowest wage-earners.
Elizabeth New (Hovde) is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Opinion: ‘Seeking might over right destroys representative government’
Retired judge Dave Larson argues that prioritizing political power over constitutional principles has undermined representative government and calls for renewed civic responsibility. - Letter: ‘Immigration’ resolution scheduled for this Wednesday at Clark County Council Meeting
Rob Anderson urges residents to closely watch an upcoming Clark County Council meeting where an immigration-related resolution and proposed rule changes are expected to be discussed. - Opinion: The 1700-square-foot solution to Washington’s housing crisis
An opinion column arguing that Washington’s energy code has driven up housing costs and outlining how HB 2486 aims to limit those impacts for smaller, more affordable homes. - Letter: Public school vision
Clark County resident Larry Roe urges a deeper community discussion about public school priorities, levy funding, and the long-term affordability of education for local families. - Opinion: House Bill 1834 would create a regulatory nightmare and restricts parental control on social media
Mark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 1834 would undermine parental authority and create sweeping regulatory and legal risks under the guise of protecting minors online.
