Liv Finne of the Washington Policy Center says the data shows that adding more billions to the current system won’t help children learn

Liv Finne
Washington Policy Center

Recently state schools superintendent Chris Reykdal announced that he plans to ask the legislature for another $2.9 billion for public education. This would be on top of the current $20.1 billion education budget.

Like the changing leaves of Fall, every year around this time Reykdal asks for more money.

Let’s ask ourselves, Will pouring in more money make a difference to children? The data shows the answer is “No.” For years the state has increased education spending, and the result has been declining academic standards and falling enrollment.

State data shows that in the last six years 43,000 students have left the public system, a 4% drop. Total public school enrollment in 2024-25 is 1.058 million students. In 2019-20 that number was 1.10 million.

Over the same period the legislature increased per-student funding by nearly $3,000, boosting it from $12,366 in 2019 to $15,177 today.  (See Legislative Budget Notes, pages 0-332 and 0-333, https://fiscal.wa.gov/lbns/2024LBN.pdf.)   

When you add federal and local money, total per student funding is $19,163.  (See fiscal.wa.gov, https://fiscal.wa.gov/K12/K12FinanceStatewide)

More money has resulted in lower-quality education for children. Public data shows that in 2019 public schools were educating 60% of students at grade level in English, and 49% at grade level in math.  In 2024 public schools are teaching only 50% of students at grade level in English and just 40% at grade level in math – a decline of ten percentage points.

Today, public schools are failing to teach a large share of students adequately in basic English and math skills. (See https://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/ReportCard/ViewSchoolOrDistrict/103300

The evidence shows that pouring more money into a bureaucratic system has not improved outcomes for students.  In fact, fueling special interest greed within a top-heavy and highly politicized government program is probably making it worse.

Yet interestingly, there is one education program that is thriving.  Charter public schools are popular with parents and have rising enrollment.  In 2019, 2,866 students attended charter schools. In 2024 enrollment has risen to 5,409, an 89% increase. (See page 0-332 of the state budget, Legislative Budget Notes.)

The flexible and innovative learning methods of charter public schools are delivering academic success for children.  The State Board of Education recently commended Washington charter schools for achieving better results for Black, Hispanic, special needs students, and for English Language Learners. (See page 6 of the State Board of Education report.)

Charter schools disproportionately serve low-income, minority students, but the powerful WEA union hates charter schools.  Union lobbyists work hard in the legislature to block charter school growth and starve their funding.  

If Superintendent Reykdal wants to improve child learning he should put $2.9 billion into funding charter schools, the one program in the system with growing enrollment. He should also repeal the ban that stops communities from opening new charter schools.  That way more families could have access to a better public school for their children.

The data shows that adding more billions to the current system won’t help children learn (although the union will love it), but expanding family access to the state’s most successful and popular learning program just might.

Liv Finne is the director of the Center for Education at the Washington Policy Center.

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: Washington passed an income tax to fund education, then the same majority cut education — and left $700+ million on the table
  State officials passed a new income tax to fund education, then approved over $1 billion in cuts—while forgoing $700 million in annual federal scholarships students could have received.
• 
  Letter: In defense of Joe Kent, a war hero
  Ozzie Gonzalez shares a firsthand account of his time working for Joe Kent, emphasizing Kent’s military background and principled stance on foreign policy controversies.
• 
  Opinion: ‘Washington’s majority party is panicking’
  Nancy Churchill argues that controversial state policies, including new taxes, law enforcement changes, and agency power grabs, are generating a wave of backlash in communities across Washington.
• 
  Letter: ‘Now we have Engineer Bob telling us the I-5 Bridge needs replacing because it is built on shifting sand with wooden structures’
  Amboy resident Thomas Schenk critiques Democrat leadership, tax policies, and the addition of light rail to the I-5 Bridge, while urging Republican voters to participate more in midterm elections.
• 
  Opinion: ‘This is not the best and most efficient use of the taxpayers’ funds’
  Ken Vance critiques the announced $14.4 billion I-5 Bridge replacement, questioning funding gaps, the insistence on light rail, unaddressed congestion, and transparency from state officials.