Liv Finne of the Washington Policy Center believes that it’s important for the public to be informed about how much school leaders are paid and how effective the system is at educating children
Liv Finne
Washington Policy Center
Earlier this week, using public records, I posted the salaries of the highest-paid school employees in Washington state for the 2021-22 school year. As a tax-funded monopoly system, it’s important for the public to be informed about how much school leaders are paid and how effective the system is at educating children. After further research, I found there is more to report about this topic.
Below is a table on K-12 School Employee Salaries as reported by the Washington State Fiscal Information, www.fiscal.wa.gov.
Here are some of the most notable findings. The Sunnyside school district superintendent received a $559,000 salary, nine times the average family wage in that area. The Tacoma School board paid out for two superintendents. Normally districts have only one superintendent, aided by one or more deputy superintendents. Carla Santorno, who retired in 2021 as superintendent, received a salary of $343,000. Her successor, Josh Garcia, received a salary of $348,000. Unless these amounts were pro-rated, it means that in 2021-22, the Tacoma School District paid nearly $700,000 in superintendent salary.
These public-dollar sums do not include employee benefits , which amount to about $50,000 per person.
Under the current system school administrators have almost no incentive to be careful stewards of public money – their pay is unrelated to student learning levels. In fact, administrators have every incentive to get more pay, and are often able to convince willing school board directors to approve these large pay increases. Public schools have plenty of money, so there is no lack of funding for this purpose.
Since a centralized monopoly has little accountability to the public, the best solution is to allow parents to have school choice. Only when school superintendents face the possibility of losing parent-directed funding to homeschooling, charter public schools or private schools will they start making spending decisions consistent with the public interest, and for the benefit of teachers and students.
In the meantime, more people recognize that public schools have become a lucrative jobs program for administrators. In many Washington communities, running the school district is the best job in town.
Also read:
- Opinion: Neighbors for a Better Crossing urges Oregon Legislators to demand full audit of IBR project, echoing Washington’s HB 2669
Gary Clark of Neighbors for a Better Crossing urges Oregon lawmakers to pursue an audit of the Interstate Bridge Replacement project similar to Washington’s HB 2669 proposal. - Opinion: Climate Commitment Act – Washington’s hidden carbon tax hits hard
Opinion, columns, Washington state, Climate Commitment Act, CCA Washington, Washington carbon tax debate, Washington gas prices, Nancy Churchill, Dangerous Rhetoric, Washington climate policy, Washington fuel costs, Travis Couture, Washington Department of Ecology, Washington Department of Commerce, Washington carbon credit auctions, Washington cap and trade program, Washington environmental policy - Letter: The Missing Skamania Report – The prosecuting attorney is still sitting on it
Rob Anderson questions why an investigative report into potential County Charter and OPMA violations has not received an outside review after being declined by multiple offices. - Opinion: Washington’s charter schools deliver – if the state lets them
Vicki Murray argues that Washington’s charter schools are posting stronger academic results than comparable peers while facing funding inequities that are shrinking the sector. - Letter: IBR’s money pit
Bob Ortblad argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program is withholding a higher cost estimate while moving forward with limited funding and an unclear construction timeline.
