Liv Finne of the Washington Policy Center points out that the bill would set the precedent of filling classrooms with district staff who are not qualified to teach

Liv Finne
Washington Policy Center

The text of SB 5054 proposes to re-define the meaning of “instructional hours” in state law to include the time students spend with non-teachers.  During that time their regular teachers would be absent and meeting in groups as newly-formed “professional learning communities.”

The effect of the bill would be to cut instruction time for students by four hours a week, from 30 hours to 26 hours. 

SB 5054 is being proposed as the level of academic achievement provided students in the public system is falling. For example, on the 2022 Smarter Balance state tests public schools failed to educate 62 percent of students adequately in math, and failed to educate 49 percent of students adequately in reading.  

SB 5054 would contribute to inequity in education.  Students attending private schools and charter public schools would continue to receive full instructional time with fully-qualified teachers. The bill would hurt the education of Washington’s 1.1 million K-12 students by denying them access to a quality education.  

In addition, the bill would set the precedent of filling classrooms with district staff who are not qualified to teach.  The bill would result in lower academic standards, and would deny students the public education they have been promised, at a time when school funding and teacher pay are at record-high levels.  Both trends would work to encourage more families to lose confidence in public education and to transfer their children to other schools.

For more information, here is our Legislative Memo on SB 5054: https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/sb-5054-to-cut-classroom-learning-time-in-schools-by-four-hours-a-week.  

Liv Finne is the director of the Center for Education at the Washington Policy Center.

---

Also read:

• 
  POLL: With updated estimates reaching as high as $17.7 billion, what should happen to the I-5 Bridge replacement project?
  A new poll asks readers how the I-5 Bridge replacement project should proceed amid higher cost estimates and questions about transparency within the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program.
• 
  Letter: ‘Walz’s tough talk is a blatant attempt to deflect his complicity in the massive fraud in his state’
  Camas resident Anna Miller argues that a governor has no legal authority to deploy the National Guard to interfere with federal law enforcement and criticizes Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz’s public statements.
• 
  Opinion: Not a Good choice
  Lars Larson argues that personal choices led to a deadly confrontation with law enforcement during an ICE operation in Minneapolis.
• 
  Opinion: ‘The IBR team has been lying to us and thanks to a veteran Oregon journalist, we have the smoking gun’
  Ken Vance argues newly obtained documents show Interstate Bridge Replacement staff withheld updated cost estimates from lawmakers and the public.
• 
  Opinion: State CO2 report shows 86% of Washington’s claimed climate benefits are probably fake
  Todd Myers argues a state climate report significantly overstates emissions reductions and raises concerns about data accuracy and accountability in Washington’s climate spending.