Sponsors say they introduced this bill because additional staff are needed to ‘better meet student needs’
Liv Finne
Washington Policy Center
Lawmakers are considering SB 5882, a bill to cut the ratio of certified teachers in public schools by increasing the number of non-teaching employees. The bill is sponsored by Senators Stanford (D-Shoreline), Wellman (D-Mercer Island), Hunt (D-Olympia), Pedersen (D-Seattle) and C. Wilson (D-Federal Way). Sponsors say they introduced this bill because additional staff are needed to “better meet student needs.”
Washington state has an education emergency which SB 5882 ignores.
Spring of 2023 test scores show that 61 percent of Washington’s students failed the state Smarter Balance test in mathematics, and 49 percent failed the English text.
SB 5882 would increase non-teaching staff in the public schools, and cut the ratio of teachers, i.e., the proportion of teachers to all staff, potentially leading to larger class sizes and reduced student access to learning.
In an emergency every available dollar should be spent on increasing the number of teachers focused on helping students recover from the learning losses they suffered due to the extended COVID school shutdowns. SB 5882 would shift resources out of the classroom and away from addressing the education emergency.
Washington state’s teacher ratio is already low. Of the 125,000 full time employees in the public schools, only 50.5 percent are classroom teachers. See Table 7 All School Personnel by Duty, 2022-23 Statewide Personnel Assignment Summary Profiles, at https://ospi.k12.wa.us/policy-funding/school-apportionment/school-publications/personnel-summary-reports.
SB 5882 would make the ratio of teachers to total staff even lower. It would also add nearly $1 Billion to the state budget within three years. See Fiscal Note to SB 5882, here: https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=5882&Initiative=false&Year=2023
For additional information see our Legislative Memo on this bill.
Liv Finne is the director of the Center for Education at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- POLL: After hearing state leaders describe the I-5 Bridge as vulnerable in an earthquake, what is your reaction?
State and local leaders describe the I-5 Bridge as structurally at risk but recommend drivers continue crossing it while complex replacement plans unfold. - Opinion: Historical state income tax and another massive operating budget highlight the end of the 2026 legislative session
Rep. John Ley details the passage of a state income tax, an expanding $80 billion budget, and new Clark County infrastructure funding following the 2026 legislative session. - Opinion: Fighting for transparency in Washington government
A recent court decision allows Washington lawmakers broad new secrecy over internal records, as advocates report rising obstacles to government transparency and public engagement. - Opinion: Attacking Democracy in the name of Democracy
Ryan Frost critiques several 2024 legislative bills, warning unchecked Democrat dominance enables policies that erode local accountability, block referenda, and threaten citizen participation. - Opinion: Washington passed an income tax to fund education, then the same majority cut education — and left $700+ million on the table
State officials passed a new income tax to fund education, then approved over $1 billion in cuts—while forgoing $700 million in annual federal scholarships students could have received.
