Elizabeth Hovde explains that it’s going to middle- and upper-income wage earners
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
What’s the hourly wage of a Paid Family and Medical Leave recipient in Washington state? It’s higher than I’m comfortable with. Lawmakers should explain to all workers why they think it is good policy to take money from low-income workers and give their money to people with ample resources.
Using hourly wage estimates from the Employment Security Department, here are the earnings of people who took the program’s tax dollars in the past fiscal year (July 2022 through June 2023):
- Up to $18/hr: 12%
- Between $18 and $24/hr: 21%
- Between $24 and $35/hr: 26%
- Between $35 and $61/hr: 26%
- More than $61/hr: 16%
Lower-income workers shouldn’t be paying higher-income workers to bond with babies or take medical time off from work. They should be able to keep more of their wages for their own needs. But the state’s Paid Family and Medical Leave (PFML) program is fueled by employees’ wages. The tax rate is 0.8 percent of wages this year and represents a doubling of the payroll tax in its short lifetime. PFML also requires employers to contribute to the fund, even though many employers already give employees paid time off for sickness or family needs. The total payment required of a worker who made $50,000 in 2023 was $400. (Calculate your yearly PFML payroll tax here.)
The fast increase of the tax is said to have happened because of high use of the program. Some government leaders are proud of that and suggest it shows how much the program was needed. Did people need this program? Maybe some. All recipients no doubt enjoyed greater ease managing life happenings, but they did so at the expense of others who then had a harder time making ends meet.
PFML is laced with entitlement. It’s hard not to feel entitled to other people’s money when you’ve been forced to pour your wages into a shared piggy bank. I hope the state doesn’t ever require low-income workers to start paying into a fund other workers can use for vacation time or mental health days away from their jobs.
All Washingtonians would benefit from policies that encourage and expect self-sufficiency, tapping taxpayer generosity only for the vulnerable. Safety nets for people in need are worthy of support. Building social programs that act as safety nets for people who are not in need — and that harm the finances of others who are less fortunate — are not.
Inflation is tough and can be aggravating. Government inflation is extra aggravating. Read more about PFML and how it harms workers’ wages here and here.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Opinion: Transit agencies need accountability not increased state subsidy
Charles Prestrud argues that Washington transit agencies face rising costs and declining ridership due to governance structures that lack public accountability. - Letter: ‘For years, American foreign policy too often felt like a blank check’
Vancouver resident Peter Bracchi argues that the 2025 National Security Strategy marks a long-overdue shift toward clearer priorities, shared responsibility, and interest-based American leadership. - POLL: Are you better off than you were a year ago?
This week’s poll asks readers to reflect on their personal financial situation and whether they feel better off than they were a year ago as economic conditions continue to shift. - Opinion: Does tailgating cause speeding?
Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl examines whether tailgating contributes to speeding and explains why following too closely increases crash risk with little benefit. - Opinion: ‘The Democrats’ part of the bargain’
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance reflects on a New Year’s Eve encounter and a Bill Maher commentary to assess what he sees as cultural and political changes from the past year.
