Mark Harmsworth believes the Washington legislature should consider a similar bill to Illinois Senate Bill 1563
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
A bill (Senate Bill 1563) that has passed the Illinois legislature that will treat squatters as trespassers is waiting for Governor J.B. Pritzker’s signature to become law. Squatters in Illinois, as in Washington, over the years have used loopholes in the law to occupy or extend residency in a house by claiming tenancy to avoid being charged with criminal trespass. This makes an eviction a lot more difficult.
Washington State’s squatter rights laws, rooted in adverse possession statutes, are increasingly problematic for property owners and communities. These laws, intended to resolve historical land disputes, allow individuals to claim ownership of property they occupy without permission, provided they meet certain criteria, such as continuous use for seven years and paying taxes. However, in practice, these laws create significant challenges that undermine property rights and public safety.
Squatter rights laws erode the fundamental principle of private property ownership. Homeowners and property owners face prolonged legal battles to evict squatters, often incurring substantial costs. In Washington, the process can take months, as courts require property owners to navigate complex eviction procedures, even when squatters have no legal claim, including substantial delays in Seattle last year. This delays justice and burdens owners, particularly small property owners who rely on rental income.
These laws strain law enforcement and local governments. Squatters often exploit legal ambiguities, forcing police to treat disputes as civil matters rather than criminal trespassing. This leaves neighborhoods vulnerable to blight, as unoccupied properties attract vandalism, drug activity, and other crimes. Data from Seattle shows a rise in complaints about squatter-occupied properties, with some areas reporting increased petty crime and decreased property values.
Squatter rights laws also discourage property investment. Developers and homeowners hesitate to purchase or maintain properties, fearing legal entanglements with squatters. This exacerbates Washington’s housing shortage, driving up costs in an already strained market.
Reforming squatter rights laws is critical. Washington should streamline eviction processes, clarify trespassing laws, and prioritize property owners’ rights. Without reform, these outdated statutes will continue to harm communities, deter investment, and undermine the rule of law. Protecting property rights is essential for a thriving, safe Washington.
The Washington legislature should consider a similar bill to Illinois Senate Bill 1563. It would go a long way to help restore property owner confidence and increase available rental properties in Washington.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Coast Guard approves fixed-span design for new Interstate Bridge
The U.S. Coast Guard has approved a fixed-span design for the new Interstate Bridge, clearing a major hurdle for the Interstate Bridge Replacement project. - Opinion: Why vote no on the Battle Ground School District levy?
Dick Rylander outlines why he believes voters should reject the Battle Ground School District levy, citing costs, enrollment trends, test results, and district spending priorities. - County Elections provides important information for upcoming special election
Clark County Elections has released key dates and instructions for voters ahead of the Feb. 10 Special Election, including ballot mailing, registration deadlines, and drop box hours. - POLL: What should be the top priority for lawmakers during the 2026 legislative session?
Clark County Today’s weekly poll asks readers to weigh in on which issue Washington lawmakers should prioritize as the 2026 legislative session approaches. - C-TRAN votes for Board Composition Review Committee to reconvene
The C-TRAN Board of Directors voted to send the issue of board representation back to the Board Composition Review Committee as disputes continue over compliance with state law and potential grant funding losses.
