Elizabeth New (Hovde) of the Washington Policy Center states that workers, including low-income ones, can’t afford WA Cares
Elizabeth New (Hovde)
Washington Policy Center
Not only would saying “yes” to Initiative 2124 make participation in the WA Cares program optional instead of mandatory, allowing people to keep more of their wages and make their own decisions about how to handle life needs, it would require state lawmakers to try and help solve a legitimate problem without harming Washington state workers. It can do both.
Instead of focusing on increasing awareness, strengthening the private insurance market or protecting ever-growing Medicaid costs, lawmakers created a program to take billions of dollars from workers, including low-income ones, to help them deal with those ever-growing costs. With a tax of 58 cents on every $100 a worker earns, WA Cares brought in $1.3 billion in its first year.
That load of money and billions more in years to come, however, will not provide long-term care to all Washingtonians as state residents are led to believe. WA Cares is set up to exclude even some of those who are likely to need long-term care.
As program supporters complain of private-insurer exclusions to long-term-care insurance (LTCI), they don’t acknowledge that WA Cares has exclusions of its own meant to keep the state taking in far more money than it has to pay out. Nor do they acknowledge that LTCI is only one of a handful of ways to plan for the possibility of needing long-term care.
Workers who do qualify for a WA Cares benefit might still end up knocking on Medicaid’s door, given the program’s lifetime benefit of $36,500. That inadequate benefit accompanies a promise from the state that workers can have peace of mind about long-term-care needs. They can’t. (Read more about WA Cares’ shortcomings in my Citizen’s Guide to Initiative 2124 here.)
WA Cares doesn’t solve the long-term-care crisis headed our way. The mandatory program does increase taxpayer dependency. It created a new entitlement for people with high incomes and resources.
Still, the top message I see on ads from the “No on I-2124” crew reads: “Vote no I-2124. We can’t afford it.”
Can’t afford it? That applies to state budget writers and the Service Employees International Union.
Mandatorily taking money from workers for WA Cares allows the state to continue ignoring priority-based budgeting. I-2124’s passage also would disappoint SEIU 775, which hopes to benefit in various ways with more taxpayer-financed caregivers in the state. The Oct. 7 Spokesman-Review reported that the anti-2124 campaign had raised more than $4.1 million, with the vast majority ($3.5 million) coming from SEIU.
Workers, including low-income ones, can’t afford WA Cares. They need today’s wages to help with the life needs they do have, not one life need they might not have and for which there is already a taxpayer-provided safety net.
Elizabeth New (Hovde) is a policy analyst and director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Rep. John Ley introduces bill to balance representation on Washington transportation boards
Legislation introduced by Rep. John Ley seeks to change how transportation board seats are allocated and prevent funding penalties tied to population-based representation rules. - Opinion: More taxes sadly the Washington way
Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues that Washington lawmakers continue to turn to new taxes instead of addressing state spending priorities, particularly in health care policy. - Maneuver to shore up WA’s transportation budget could be reversed
Washington lawmakers are weighing whether to reverse a planned sales tax transfer to transportation as they confront a looming operating budget shortfall. - Rep. John Ley issues statement after I-5 Bridge replacement meeting yields few answers
Rep. John Ley criticized the IBR Program for failing to provide updated cost estimates or key design decisions following a recent legislative oversight committee meeting. - Opinion: Blood on the highways fails to move Ferguson and Kotek
Lars Larson criticizes Washington and Oregon governors over licensing policies he says are linked to deadly truck crashes and ongoing highway safety risks.
