Instead of imposing burdensome regulations, Mark Harmsworth says the legislature should focus on empowering parents with the tools and knowledge they need to navigate the online world safely
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
House Bill 1834 (HB 1834), introduced by Representative Callan, aimed at protecting minors online, is a prime example of government going too far. While safeguarding children online from inappropriate content is everyone’s goal, HB 1834 is deeply flawed and poses serious litigation risks to business and parental rights.
Similar to Senate Bill 5708 (SB 5708), introduced by Senator Frame (D), which was passed by the Senate in 2025 but failed to pass the House, the bill aims to protect minors online by regulating “addictive feeds” and “addictive internet-based services.” It would require online platforms to ‘estimate’ user age, apply privacy protections, and obtain parental consent for notifications. The bill would restrict data collection on identified minors but takes the first step in reducing parental oversight by parents by restricting access to some types of data from a minor’s social media account.
Rather than limiting the access of minors to “addictive feeds,” it limits parents’ ability to monitor their children’s use of social media.
An addictive feed is defined as a feed that a social media platform creates that uses algorithms to customize the feed content to an end user. An algorithm driven feed arguably provides a better user experience as the content is more relevant to the end user but comes with privacy concerns.
One of the concerning aspects of HB 1834 is its potential infringement on parental authority. While parents undoubtedly want to protect their children online, this bill shifts significant control to the state. By mandating specific privacy settings and imposing restrictions on how online services can interact with minors, the bill undermines parents’ ability to make informed decisions about their children’s online experiences. As an example, the bill calls for not collecting the minor’s location information which would be invaluable in a kidnapping or missing person case where the parent needs to locate the child’s whereabouts.
Additionally, the bill requires social media companies to “provide an obvious signal to the minor when the minor is being monitored or tracked,” by the “minor’s parent, guardian,” or others. The legislation actively makes it more difficult for parents to detect any dangerous interactions their children may be having online by warning minors that they are being watched.
Instead of imposing burdensome regulations, the legislature should focus on empowering parents with the tools and knowledge they need to navigate the online world safely. This includes promoting media literacy education, supporting the development of better parental control technologies, and fostering open communication between parents and children about online safety.
HB 1834 represents a significant overreach by the state government, with potentially damaging consequences for businesses and families. Rather than pursuing this misguided approach, the legislature should prioritize policies that promote innovation, respect parental rights, and empower individuals to make informed decisions about their online activities.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- WA Senate Republicans unable to stop income tax bill now headed to governor’s desk
Washington lawmakers narrowly approved a new income tax on households earning over $1 million, setting the stage for court battles and a statewide initiative campaign. - 17th District lawmakers Kevin Waters and David Stuebe decry passage of state income tax bill after marathon floor debate
Reps. Kevin Waters and David Stuebe condemn Senate Bill 6346, warning the new state income tax sends more money into the general fund without real reform, risks expanding to every family, and ignores Washington’s affordability crisis. - Opinion: Washington’s fight for liberty
Conservative columnist Nancy Churchill argues that despite the passage of a new 9.9% state income tax, signs of shifting political momentum in Washington state give reason for hope and continued action. - 18th District Reps. Stephanie McClintock and John Ley denounce passage of state income tax
Following a marathon 24-hour House floor debate, 18th District Reps. Stephanie McClintock and John Ley denounce Senate Bill 6346, a new 9.9% state income tax on household income above $1 million, warning it could expand broadly, harm Washington’s economy, and face serious constitutional challenges. - Opinion: Brandi Kruse and I are feeling discouraged but we’re planning to continue advocating for political change. Will you?
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance reflects on a discouraging week in Washington state politics, echoing Brandi Kruse’s frustrations over Democrats’ state income tax victory and local decisions on transit and ICE while urging conservatives not to give up on advocating for political change.
