Jason Mercier of the Washington Policy Center shares an interview with former IRS attorney Steven Hankin
Washington Policy Center
Tax experts across the world will all tell you the same thing, a capital gains tax is an income tax, not an “excise tax” as claimed by Washington officials. We’ve heard this fact clearly from 49 state revenue departments, tax professors, academics, and the IRS. Those versed in tax law remain perplexed by Washington officials’ arguments that they alone have discovered how to tax capital gains income as an excise tax. One of those individuals is a former IRS attorney, Steven Hankin. Mr. Hankin recently contacted me to express his strong belief that this isn’t even a debatable topic – a capital gains tax is clearly an income tax.
Below is an interview with Mr. Hankin discussing his thoughts on Washington’s capital gains income tax. He wanted to make clear that he was not speaking on behalf of the IRS but instead these are his thoughts as a former IRS tax attorney. Here was our conversation:
Can you tell me about your tax background and former role at the IRS?
Mr. Hankin: “I was a managing attorney in the Office of Chief Counsel, IRS. I worked there for about thirty years. For the last roughly 18 years, I was in the Corporate Division of the Chief Counsel. As such, I worked on Subchapter C matters, which are corporate tax issues. Prior to that, I had worked on a wide variety of income tax issues. But I never had anything to do with excise taxes. I worked on private letter rulings, and I was involved with drafting regulations, and I provided technical tax advice to our attorneys in the field.”
In your opinion, is a capital gains tax an excise tax or an income tax?
Mr. Hankin: “I have always considered the capital gains tax to be an income tax, rather than an excise tax. The capital gains tax is a tax on the seller of property, that is being sold, while an excise tax is a tax on the transfer or use of the property. Income taxes (and other property taxes) are direct taxes that the US Constitution requires an apportionment. On the other hand, an excise tax is a tax on the transfer of the property rather than a tax on the seller’s ownership interest in the property. Excise taxes are indirect taxes, and the US Constitution only requires that such tax be applied uniformly throughout the country. Again, a capital gains tax is a tax on the ownership interest of the seller (with respect to property being sold).
A capital gains tax is arguably a tax on the property itself and as such, it is not a tax on the sale or use of something. By contrast, an excise tax is a tax on a transaction, (on the purchase or sale or use of something), instead of a tax on an ownership interest, An income tax and other property taxes are ‘direct taxes,’ while excise taxes are ‘indirect taxes.’ Clearly, income taxes, as direct taxes, cannot be considered as excise taxes. An income tax is not a tax on a transaction.”
Do you agree with Washington’s contention that a capital gains tax is a transactional tax like a Real Estate Excise Tax?
Mr. Hankin: “I disagree with the State of Washington’s contention that a capital gains tax is a transactional tax, akin to a real estate excise tax. As I previously stated, a capital gains tax is a tax on the seller’s ownership interest in the property rather than a tax on the transaction.”
Are you aware of any tax jurisdiction in the world outside of Washington state calling a capital gains tax an excise tax?
Mr. Hankin: “Although I have not researched it, I am not personally aware of any tax jurisdiction, outside of Washington State, that has ever treated a transaction, that because it is subject to the capital gains tax could be subjected to an excise tax transaction, simply on the basis that there is a transfer of property, involved. Certainly, a capital gains tax is not an excise tax.”
Anything else you’d like to add about capital gains taxes and the current litigation?
Mr. Hankin: “Washington State is misguided in believing that just because there is a transfer of property involved, it provides a basis for the imposition of an excise tax. Frankly, I am unable to see why this matter is considered to be controversial. That is, I see no reasonable argument for saying that a capital gains tax is not an income tax, and for that reason could be subject to an excise tax. I am somewhat dumbfounded as to why the State of Washington believes it has any reasonable chance of ever prevailing in this case.”
Thank you, Mr. Hankin for sharing your tax expertise with us.
The state Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on the capital gains income tax on January 26, 2023.
Jason Mercier is the director of the Center for Government Reform at the Washington Policy Center.
- POLL: Do you agree with a Seattle lawmaker that police pursuit reform legislation is based on a ‘massive misinformation campaign?Do you agree with a Seattle lawmaker that police pursuit reform legislation is based on a ‘massive misinformation campaign?
- Opinion: SB 5582 would widen the nurse pipeline in Washington stateElizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center believes ‘we need to grow more nurses in Washington state.’
- Opinion: State lawmakers have an opportunity to help patients, nurses, hospitals with SB 5499Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center states that multistate license holders not only increase access to care across state lines when necessary, they also maintain and augment patient safety.
- Opinion: As governor highlights threat from climate change, state agencies ignore his EV purchase requirementTodd Myers of the Washington Policy Center believes it is more evidence that relying on politicians to achieve environmental goals is unwise.
- Opinion: Economic Security for All program benefits local job seekers and businessesMiriam Halliday, CEO of Workforce Southwest Washington, offers her thoughts on efforts to move Washingtonians to good-paying careers.
By JASON MERCIER | POLICY BRIEF Aug 31, 2022
1. A comparative study finds Washington’s constitution has the broadest definition of property of any state.
2. As a result, for nearly 100 years the state supreme court has ruled that Washingtonians own their income because it is their property.
3. The supreme court has repeatedly ruled a graduated income tax is illegal unless the state constitution is amended first.
4. Voters rejected a constitutional amendment to allow a graduated income tax in 1934, 1936, 1938, 1942, 1970 and 1973, most recently by a 77% “no” vote.
5. Voters rejected income tax ballot initiatives in 1944, 1975, 1982 and 2010, most recently by a 64% “no” vote.
6. Given the legal facts, the state supreme court should reject the latest attempt to circumvent the will of the people as clearly expressed in the constitution and at the ballot box.
Washington state voted down amending constitution every time legislators tried getting it passed. Legislators requiring Washington citizens to file/pay the tax snubs the moral rights of the voter.