Todd Myers of the Washington Policy Center says that using forest fires to justify the CO2 tax is a smokescreen
Todd Myers
Washington Policy Center
In his editorial on Washington’s CO2 tax, Dr. Vin Gupta claims he likes “to go to the data to find the truth.” But he starts by saying something false.
He claims Spokane has “declining air quality.” This is false. EPA data for Spokane County show that since 2000, average levels of particulate matter have fallen by more than 20% – from “moderate” to consistently “good.”
He clearly didn’t look at the data.
In fact, air quality will continue to improve without the CO2 tax. In 2019, the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency released a report on a proposal for a low-carbon fuel standard showing the impact of the policy on air quality. The study found that between 2019 and 2030 there would be a significant reduction in particulate matter (PM2.5) under the business as usual (BAU) scenario. This was two years before the Climate Commitment Act had been proposed.
Air quality will be better in 2030 with or without the CO2 tax.
Additionally, he says the CO2 tax would reduce the risk of smoke from catastrophic wildfire. Of the $3.2 billion from the CO2 tax, only $12 million – just 0.4% of the tax revenue – is budgeted to go to forest health. By way of comparison, more is spent on funding for government planning than forest health.
If preventing catastrophic wildfire was truly important, the legislature would have used more of the nearly $20 billion in new tax revenue the state received in the past four years.
Instead, the largest threat to projects that reduce the risk of wildfire are the very environmental groups supporting the CO2 tax. When the Colville Confederated Tribes worked with the Forest Service to thin unhealthy forests on their border, Spokane-based environmental groups immediately sued – preventing efforts to improve forest health and prevent catastrophic wildfires.
Using forest fires to justify the CO2 tax is a smokescreen.
Todd Myers is the vice president for research at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Letter: Has $450 million been wasted on a bridge that’s too low for the Coast Guard with a foundation too costly to build?
A Seattle engineer questions whether hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on a bridge design he argues is unnecessarily risky and costly compared to an immersed tunnel alternative. - Opinion: Fix Washington – House Republicans lead the charge against liberal chaos
Nancy Churchill argues that one-party Democratic control has driven up costs, weakened public safety, and harmed schools, and says House Republicans are offering a path forward through their Fix Washington agenda. - Opinion: Biden agreed with Trump on Maduro, so why aren’t liberals celebrating?
Lars Larson questions why American Democrats are reacting with outrage to the arrest of Venezuelan dictator Nicholas Maduro despite prior bipartisan agreement on prosecuting him. - Letter: If I were a politician
A Yacolt resident offers a sharply critical, satirical take on how he believes modern politicians misuse public trust, taxpayer dollars, and government power. - Opinion: Transit agencies need accountability not increased state subsidy
Charles Prestrud argues that Washington transit agencies face rising costs and declining ridership due to governance structures that lack public accountability.
