Todd Myers of the Washington Policy Center says that using forest fires to justify the CO2 tax is a smokescreen
Todd Myers
Washington Policy Center
In his editorial on Washington’s CO2 tax, Dr. Vin Gupta claims he likes “to go to the data to find the truth.” But he starts by saying something false.
He claims Spokane has “declining air quality.” This is false. EPA data for Spokane County show that since 2000, average levels of particulate matter have fallen by more than 20% – from “moderate” to consistently “good.”
He clearly didn’t look at the data.
In fact, air quality will continue to improve without the CO2 tax. In 2019, the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency released a report on a proposal for a low-carbon fuel standard showing the impact of the policy on air quality. The study found that between 2019 and 2030 there would be a significant reduction in particulate matter (PM2.5) under the business as usual (BAU) scenario. This was two years before the Climate Commitment Act had been proposed.
Air quality will be better in 2030 with or without the CO2 tax.
Additionally, he says the CO2 tax would reduce the risk of smoke from catastrophic wildfire. Of the $3.2 billion from the CO2 tax, only $12 million – just 0.4% of the tax revenue – is budgeted to go to forest health. By way of comparison, more is spent on funding for government planning than forest health.
If preventing catastrophic wildfire was truly important, the legislature would have used more of the nearly $20 billion in new tax revenue the state received in the past four years.
Instead, the largest threat to projects that reduce the risk of wildfire are the very environmental groups supporting the CO2 tax. When the Colville Confederated Tribes worked with the Forest Service to thin unhealthy forests on their border, Spokane-based environmental groups immediately sued – preventing efforts to improve forest health and prevent catastrophic wildfires.
Using forest fires to justify the CO2 tax is a smokescreen.
Todd Myers is the vice president for research at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: The income tax proposal has arrived
Ryan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that a proposed Washington income tax creates a new revenue stream rather than delivering tax reform or relief. - Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district. - POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?
Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs. - Opinion: IBR falsely blaming inflation
Joe Cortright argues that inflation explains only a small portion of the IBR project’s cost increases and that rising consultant and staff expenses are the primary drivers. - Letter: The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $141 million bribe can be better spent on sandwich steel-concrete tubes
Bob Ortblad argues that an immersed tunnel using sandwich steel-concrete tubes would be a more cost-effective alternative to the current Interstate Bridge Replacement Program design.
