
Elizabeth Hovde believes state hiring should be based on skills and abilities needed for a position, without automatically excluding those who don’t hold a college degree.
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
Washington state should be acknowledging the many different routes to growing one’s work qualifications, including on-the-job training and advancement, apprenticeships, internships, vocational training and life experiences. A college education is not always the way to acquire skills that are pertinent to a state job. As the Harvard Business School put it, “Jobs do not require four-year degrees. Employers do.”

Thankfully, Gov. Jay Inslee is on board with the idea that a college-degree requirement on a job posting can limit qualified applicants. He is among a growing number of governors, both Republican and Democrat, doing something to open up their state workforces.
While Inslee hasn’t issued an executive order to end the four-year degree requirement in most state jobs, as Gov. Josh Shapiro, D-Pennsylvania, made a splash doing in January, he has asked the state’s human resources team to work toward ensuring state jobs are free from unnecessary barriers that can limit the state’s workforce and undervalue what applicants bring to the table. That team is at work, offering best practices to hiring managers in the state and looking for more ways to reach a wider group of prospective employees.
Barriers can include, but aren’t limited to, an unnecessary college-degree requirement. Other barriers? The state is looking at ways to make job announcements more welcoming to people intimidated by certain wording or a list of desired qualities, for example. The state HR team is also looking into ways to open up interviews to untraditional times of the day. This could bring in more qualified job seekers.
Right now, the state doesn’t require degrees for any job where one isn’t required by law (e.g. a medical degree is required to practice medicine, etc.). However, a governor spokesperson told me that some hiring managers in various state agencies might still choose to include degree requirements.
Michaela Doelman, the state’s chief human resources officer, told me she thinks less than 20% of state job openings have a college-degree requirement when they needn’t. Often, desired qualifications include a “this or that” description, allowing for certain experience or a college degree to be acceptable. With the best practices that have been issued, that 20% might go down even lower.
“We want a government workforce that is effective,” Doelman said. “This is about relooking at the system and redesigning it so people can demonstrate if they are qualified to do the work.” She added that the state is trying to get rid of an assumption that there is only one way to get skills and qualifications.
I look forward to state leaders opening more doors to qualified applicants. It will also help the state fulfill its service role to taxpayers, attracting the best talent available.
State hiring should be based on skills and abilities needed for a position, without automatically excluding those who don’t hold a college degree.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Opinion: Sheriffs fight backFour county sheriffs are suing to block a new law giving a governor-appointed board power to decertify and remove sheriffs, bypassing voter oversight in Washington.
- Opinion: The growing gap between public voice and political powerTodd Myers describes how large-scale protest and sign-ins often fail to sway state leaders, and argues authentic influence is most likely found through local action.
- Opinion: Who is winning the race for affordable power?Hydroelectric power keeps Washington competitive, but new laws and carbon pricing are driving up electricity costs for residents each year.
- Opinion: Half the road, full stop – Understanding pedestrian right-of-wayDoug Dahl explains how Washington’s law requires drivers to stop when a pedestrian is within one lane of their half of the road, not just when directly in front.
- Opinion: The state’s RFK-proofing bill comes with a costMandates like HB 2242 can lead to higher premiums as insurance companies absorb costs for new preventive services, affecting affordability statewide.







