Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center suggests people concerned about a COVID-19 vaccine requirement for school entry in Washington should continue to follow State Board of Health activity
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advisory committee on vaccines approved adding COVID-19 vaccines to the agency’s recommended immunization schedules for both children and adults on Thursday. Many people are worried this means schools will now require COVID-19 shots for school children. That’s not how this works. The decision around the vaccine requirement for school entry stays more local.
Dr. Nirav Shah, a member of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, told Rueters, “Adding the COVID-19 vaccine to the recommended childhood immunization schedule does not constitute a requirement that any child receive the vaccine.” He said the decision around school entrance for vaccines “rests where it did before, which is with the state level, the county level and at the municipal level.”
There are already vaccines on the schedule, such as seasonal flu shots, that are not required for school attendance in many places, Shah noted.
In April, the Washington State Board of Health (SBOH) decided not to add a COVID-19 vaccine requirement after an exploration of the idea. The SBOH took advice from a technical advisory group it assembled that recommended against the immunization requirement for school entry. Board members did reiterate support for COVID-19 vaccines and hoped for voluntary vaccination of school children.
Members of the advisory group expressed concern that the public health benefit that might be achieved through the requirement would be outweighed by the many downsides of such a rule. One of those downsides was putting schools in a position to have to police the requirement. There was also valid concern that not enough is known about COVID-19’s transmissibility or vaccine outcomes for children to justify a vaccination requirement. (Read more about the SBOH process here and here.)
People concerned about a COVID-19 vaccine requirement for school entry in Washington should continue to follow State Board of Health activity. The board could revisit the issue in the future.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Opinion: The income tax proposal has arrived
Ryan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that a proposed Washington income tax creates a new revenue stream rather than delivering tax reform or relief. - Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district. - POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?
Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs. - Opinion: IBR falsely blaming inflation
Joe Cortright argues that inflation explains only a small portion of the IBR project’s cost increases and that rising consultant and staff expenses are the primary drivers. - Letter: The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $141 million bribe can be better spent on sandwich steel-concrete tubes
Bob Ortblad argues that an immersed tunnel using sandwich steel-concrete tubes would be a more cost-effective alternative to the current Interstate Bridge Replacement Program design.
InformedChoiceWA reported on a a key WA State Board of Health meeting
“WA BOH’s Vote Supports Option of Mandating Experimental Vaccines for Children”“The WA State Board of Health (BOH) yesterday voted to deny ICWA’s petition request that they adopt a new, permanent rule prohibiting adding to the day care or school requirements any Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) product or any licensed product formulation which has not yet completed Phase 3 clinical trials.
EUA products, and products which have not completed long term Phase 3 clinical trials are experimental.”
“Dr. Pendergrass said, “I do not want to be in the setting where I am preventing some future event from occurring.” He also stated that historically, there is a precedent for mandating EUA shots because the polio vaccine was required for school in the 1950’s just after the vaccines were developed. His statement was inaccurate and it did not support his stance. In fact, it did the opposite. First, EUA’s did not exist until 2004.
Second, the rollout of the polio vaccines in the absence of adequate safety studies and oversight is one of the biggest blunders in vaccine history.
..”.Temple Lentz and Keith Grellner also agreed with Dr. Pendergrass about not wanting to tie the hands of future boards in regards to mandating experimental products.
State Chief Science Officer Tao Sheng Kwan-Gett, the Secretary of Health’s designee, agreed with Dr. Pendergrass on behalf of Secretary Shah, who is a board member…..
ICWA is dismayed and alarmed that the BOH believes their vote preserves an option for themselves and for future boards to be able to mandate experimental products (EUA) on children.”
See the full report which also provides video of the meeting.
Thank you for your well researched post, Margaret.
The research was done by InformedChoiceWa.org who submitted the petition to the WA Board of Health, and reported on the meeting. I just posted excerpts from their article, and the link for the full article, which includes video of the meeting.
As noted in the article, the members of the WA Board of Health are all appointed by Governor Inslee, including Temple Lentz(D) who is a current Clark County Councilor.