Voters are asked to consider the same levy request that was rejected in the February special election

Dick Rylander
SWWEducation.org

In February, the Woodland School District placed a replacement levy on the ballot … and lost. They are returning in the April 25 special election with the same levy. No changes. Just another request that voters reconsider and give them the money.

In this article we’ll pull together some information for your review and consideration. We’re not here to tell you to vote Yes or NO. We’re here to help make sure that you have both sides of view. The school board and district have one goal: pass the levy. Their information on the website and in any mailers will focus on why voters should say yes. They are not required to share any Con information. They are not required to present a balanced view. They have the money and resources to paint the picture supporting their ask. In short, they are inherently biased and have an “iron in the fire” and a vested interest in a yes vote.

So why might someone vote no?

1. Let’s first share the information from the February levy:  Woodland School District 2023 Levy (www education.org) 
2. Here’s a website that is the most comprehensive K-12 data set on Washington State. Take a few minutes to review the facts: Woodland School District | The School Data Project
3. How is Woodland doing according to the OSPI Scorecard?  Report Card – Washington State Report Card (ospi.k12.wa.us) 
4. Analysis of the Woodland Levy based on data: School District Measures April 25th 2023 | The School Data Project

Here’s a comparison of school districts in Southwest Washington that may help you get benchmarks. (Where does this data come from? The OSPI Report Card website):

Some questions you might consider as you choose how to vote:

• Are you happy with the education the children are getting?
• Do you think they are using the money wisely?
• Will the increase in this “replacement” levy make a difference and if so how?
• Can you afford the increase? Has your income kept pace with inflation and the cost of living?

Summary:

• Of the eight (8) school districts in the table (above) Woodland spends $17,986/student/year which is #1…#1.
• Their attendance rate, at 80.6% is the highest of any of the districts.
• Their test scores appear to be in the middle of the pack

The district is painting a dire picture if the levy fails. Given their spending levels and results you decide whether those are scare tactics or true. Whatever you do please don’t act out of fear or be intimidated. Make an informed decision … and vote.

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: Washingtonians want affordability, not more taxes, according to our recent survey
  Rep. John Ley shares results from a legislative survey showing affordability concerns and opposition to new taxes among respondents, while outlining Republican priorities in Olympia.
• 
  Opinion: Schumer insults black Americans with ‘Jim Crow 2.0’ comment
  Lars Larson argues that Democratic opposition to the SAVE Act contradicts voter support for photo ID requirements and unfairly characterizes minority voters.
• 
  Letter: ‘Hockinson is worth investing in, and this levy is part of that commitment’
  James Landon argues that supporting the Hockinson Schools levy is a necessary investment in the community, its schools, and the next generation.
• 
  Letter: PDX activists flood Clark County Council over anti-ICE resolution
  Rob Anderson argues that organized Portland-based activist groups dominated public comment at a Clark County Council meeting to pressure councilors over an anti-ICE resolution.
• 
  Opinion: Moving the ball down the field
  Nancy Churchill argues that while HB 2221 will not advance this session, the public hearing marked meaningful progress by opening dialogue, building relationships, and advancing science-based wildlife management discussions in Olympia.