Camas resident Anna Miller offers a tutorial on the Clark County Charter
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Good question. No doubt you’ll be seeing campaign signs popping up around the County asking for your vote for Clark County Charter Review Commissioner. Hopefully you will be fully informed before the voting ballots start arriving for the November 2025 General Election. Let’s break it down.
- In November 2014 voters of Clark County voted to adopt the “home rule charter” form of government. What the HECK is that? Read all about it here! Don’t worry, it’s an easy short read. MRSC – County Forms of Government
- Ok, now you know what a home rule Charter is. It is the County’s Constitution. But let’s back up a minute. Who the HECK wrote the Charter that was voted in? Another good question. Freeholders, that’s who.
- What the HECK are Freeholders? The Freeholder election involved a bunch of people who ran for the positions called Freeholders. Those elected Freeholders were responsible for drafting the county’s Home Rule Charter, which shaped everything from government structure to citizen rights like initiative and referendum. It’s a powerful civic role! The Charter they drafted was then submitted to the voters for approval. A majority of voters said yes, so we had to live with it. Or, did we?
- How the HECK do we change it if we don’t like it? I’m glad you asked. That brings us full circle. The Charter allows for a “review and amend” process every 5 years. A bunch of people (again) file to run for the positions of Charter Review Committee. The winners are called Charter Review Commissioners. They are tasked with reviewing and possibly amending the Charter. Their completed work goes (again) to the people to vote on.
- What the HECK? I like some of the amendments but not others! No worries. You can vote “yes” for those you like and “no” for those you don’t like.
- In five years, we will do it all over, (again)! What the heck?
Study the current Charter Overview | Clark County with a yellow hi-lighter. Talk to the candidates about what you would like to see amended. And don’t skip the vote. You might regret it.
Anna Miller
Clark County voter
Also read:
- Opinion: The unpreferred and unaffordable Interstate Bridge replacement proposal
Rep. John Ley argues that the Interstate Bridge Replacement proposal is unpreferred, unaffordable, and failing to address congestion, cost transparency, and community concerns. - POLL: If project costs continue to rise, what should lawmakers do with the I-5 Bridge replacement plan?
This poll asks readers what lawmakers should do with the I-5 Bridge replacement plan as costs rise and key decisions remain unresolved. - Opinion: IBR still holding and lying about coming billions in cost overruns
Joe Cortright argues that Interstate Bridge Replacement officials are deliberately delaying the release of an updated cost estimate that he says could push the project toward $10 billion. - Opinion: Another problem with strike pay from the UI fund – Potential double-dipping, overpayments
Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues that Washington’s new strike pay law risks overpayments and double-dipping unless workers are clearly warned at the point of applying for unemployment benefits. - Letter: A call for competent Interstate Bridge project management
Rick Vermeers argues that unchecked scope, rising costs, and missed timelines threaten the survival of the Interstate Bridge Replacement project unless light rail is removed.
