Ann Donnelly expressed her ‘strongest possible opposition’ to any further consideration of Councilor Wil Fuentes’ suggestion that the invocation be removed from Council meetings
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Here is the letter I sent to all County Council members on Jan. 13.
“Dear Council Members:
I am writing to express my strongest possible opposition to your further consideration of Councilor Fuentes’ suggestion that the invocation be removed from Council meetings. I appreciate that at your January 9 meeting you agreed to pause a decision on that suggestion.
Our region and state are facing very serious budget crises. As I wrote in my January 4 Columbian column on the challenges of paying for light rail, “on the state and local level, the Washington legislature, the Clark County Council, and the Vancouver City Council are simultaneously grappling with budget deficits and rising costs. When asked, voters are inclined to revolt against new taxes, as occurred last November with Vancouver’s failed Proposition 4 to pay for additional police officers.”
At the County level, voters will at some point be asked to approve measures providing new taxation for our urgently needed jail remodel and for additional Sheriff’s personnel to address our extreme need in that area. Our needs to address homelessness, mental illness, and drug addiction are also well known to all of you.
You must demonstrate to County voters that you, their elected leaders, understand these priorities. Councilor Fuentes’ divisive suggestion on his first day in office dangerously sends the opposite message. That he even momentarily considered removing the Pledge of Allegiance is even more concerning.
When you go to the taxpayers of this county for additional money out of their already burdened family budgets, you are going to need every vote, as shown by the results of Proposition 4. You cannot afford to alienate many who believe that a moment of reflection and faith to begin a meeting is time well spent in these challenging times.
As Manager Otto correctly observed, the invocation is not restricted to prayers. For people of faith, speakers of many churches and belief systems may participate.
Thank you for setting aside this ill-considered topic of discussion.”
Ann Donnelly
Vancouver
Also read:
- Opinion: Half the road, full stop – Understanding pedestrian right-of-way
Doug Dahl explains how Washington’s law requires drivers to stop when a pedestrian is within one lane of their half of the road, not just when directly in front. - Opinion: The state’s RFK-proofing bill comes with a cost
Mandates like HB 2242 can lead to higher premiums as insurance companies absorb costs for new preventive services, affecting affordability statewide. - Opinion: What is the cost of a bridge?
John Ley argues the I-5 Bridge replacement’s soaring cost stems from costly extras like light rail, noting other states deliver larger, toll-free bridges for much less. - POLL: Do you agree with giving a state commission the power to remove an elected sheriff?
A new poll asks if a state commission—not voters—should have the power to remove an elected sheriff, following concerns raised by Clark County Sheriff John Horch. - Opinion: Defending Democracy by denying it?
Washington voters are blocked from weighing in on new income taxes as state lawmakers and officials bypass public input, drawing criticism from Northwest voices.
