Letter: Time for Vancouver and Clark County to end DEI



Vancouver resident Peter Bracchi says area DEI efforts were launched with good intentions, but they were not born out of public demand

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com

In recent years, both Vancouver and Clark County have embraced Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. These efforts were launched with good intentions, but they were not born out of public demand. They came from inside government — adopted by city councils, county departments, and agencies — without any real vote or broad consent from the people who pay for them.

Peter Bracchi
Peter Bracchi

In Vancouver, the City Council adopted its Equity Framework in 2021, saying it would make city government fairer and more welcoming. Clark County followed with DEI policies in Public Works, Human Resources, and even the District Court. Local businesses were also encouraged to get on board. Yet after years of reports, committees, and training sessions, where are the results? The city and county have yet to show how these programs are improving lives. What we do know is that they cost time, money, and resources — while creating division and confusion instead of unity.

The problems with DEI are not unique to Clark County. At the federal level, we’ve already seen how costly and divisive these programs can be. Earlier this year, President Trump signed orders to end DEI in the federal government. The Department of Education quickly removed training materials and eliminated DEI positions after finding they blurred the line with race-based preferences and wasted taxpayer dollars. The Department of Defense also spent millions on DEI staff and programs, yet recruitment and readiness continued to decline — showing no real benefit from all that investment.

Here in Washington State, the Office of Equity has also stirred controversy. Some state workers reported feeling pressured to adopt political views during mandatory DEI training, with several even describing the sessions as hostile. Parents across the state have raised concerns about schools lowering standards in the name of equity, and in King County, DEI-focused hiring reviews actually slowed down recruitment for critical public safety jobs. Even Clark County’s own DEI guidance documents admit underrepresentation in leadership but propose more layers of bureaucracy instead of direct solutions. These are not successes — they are warnings.

If Washington, D.C. and Olympia are already facing problems with DEI, why should Vancouver and Clark County keep doubling down? Continuing down this path could even put federal grants at risk if local governments refuse to align with new national rules. More importantly, it ignores what the people of this community actually want.

At its core, fairness and respect don’t require expensive new offices or layers of bureaucracy. They require leaders who listen to the people and apply the same rules to everyone. Citizens never asked for DEI in our city or county governments. It was brought in from the top down, without consent.

Now is the time to change course. Vancouver and Clark County should bring DEI to an end and refocus on the basics: keeping neighborhoods safe, fixing roads, protecting our environment, and ensuring public resources are used wisely.

Good intentions aren’t enough. Government must reflect the will of the people, not the latest political trend. DEI has run its course — let’s put our focus back where it belongs.

Peter Bracchi
Vancouver


Also read:

3 Comments

  1. Bob Koski

    For reference, Vancouver’s budget allocates $500,000 annually for DEI Staff salaries, including the Director of DEI who is paid on the same scale as the City Attorney.

    Reply
  2. Jason

    Peter Bracchi argues that Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in Clark County was imposed without demand and has delivered little. That misses the mark.

    Government does not wait for unanimous applause before acting. Traffic laws, health codes, and fire protection were not born from petitions; they came from leaders stepping up before problems grew worse. DEI is no different. It is not charity, it is strategy, reducing blind spots so government serves everyone more effectively.

    Claims that DEI “creates division” confuse discomfort with failure. Change unsettles, but it also exposes long-ignored inequities. That is progress, not a flaw.

    And let us not kid ourselves. Every serious employer, from Boeing to PeaceHealth, invests in DEI because it improves performance. Why should local government pretend it does not matter?

    Fairness and respect are not automatic. They require attention, correction, and, at times, committees and reports. Abandoning DEI now would send only one message: equality is negotiable. That would be retreat, not leadership.

    Jason
    Felida, WA

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *