Letter: The Hockinson School District ‘fails to make the case that extra money will be used to improve education’


Brush Prairie resident Bill Eling shares his thoughts on the upcoming Hockinson School District levy on the Feb. 8 special election ballot

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com

Though I share the sentiment that Hockinson is a great community and that a small local school district is a fine thing, after 30 years of voting in favor of school levies I cannot vote in favor of the Hockinson levy on February 8. The District fails to make the case that extra money will be used to improve education and there is no legal guarantee the District will fund the programs used to sell the levy to voters.

Bill Eling
Bill Eling

The sales pitch is curious but follows a well-worn trajectory: everything you and the kids enjoy will go away. No sports, no electives, no band, no nurse. They tell you this levy is only 10-11 percent of the total budget. But here is what they don’t tell you: if the budget is around $27 million, and 10 percent of $27 million is $2.7m, then why is the “replacement levy” $4 million plus a year? Why didn’t the District just replace current funding instead of cranking it up an extra million? And why increase it 9% each successive year?

Where’s the money going? The District’s November 16, 2021 official request for pre-ballot approval of the enrichment levy sent to the Office of the Superintendent shows that $39,545, less than 1 percent of the $4 million dollars goes to “Supplies, Instructional Resources and Purchased Services.” 99 percent goes to salaries and benefits.

What happens when more families leave the District and the District loses the State per-pupil money? Why does the State Auditor write that the District has a “Significant Contingent Liability” of $50,000 to $250,000 in attorney fees? [Source: Washington State Audit Report No 1028204, April 26, 2021, Note 3, page 42.] How will the District make that up? These are legitimate questions which deserve answers.

So the sales pitch is no surprise. If the District sent voters copies of OSPI’s Pre-Ballot Approval plan instead of glossy flyers, the difference between the pitch and the plan would be obvious. The levy is for salaries. It is not like salaries have been stagnant. After the 2018 strike salaries increased 14.5 percent and an additional 2 percent per annum in successive years. Other moneys such as ESSER funds went to salaries. [Source: HSD Budget PowerPoint Presentation, June 28, 2021, p. 2].

What’s troubling is with all of this money, the District is failing our students. While Hockinson students may do better on state tests than other districts, our scores are nothing to crow about. According to calculations based on OSPI Data Portal 2018-19 pre-COVID testing data, 29.1 percent of our students fail to meet the minimum standard for English; 37.6 percent fail in Science; and 41.9 percent fail in Math. Although OSPI has not yet reported district by district statistics for the COVID years, OSPI has reported a significant drop statewide.

If our teachers need professional support to help them help our kids exceed standards, I am all for it. Instead the State requires our teachers to learn about white privilege and cultural oppression. Even assuming such training has merit, it is difficult to see how focusing on contentious racial and sexual theories will help our kids meet or exceed minimum standards.

If this levy fails, I am certain the District will seek another vote in April. But by April we will know whether the Legislature has reduced the school week to 4 days. By April we should know current HSD test results. By April we may know if the Governor will impose a student vaccine mandate. By April, the District has time to move from the sales pitch to a candid discussion. Until then, I vote no.

Bill Eling
Brush Prairie

Receive comment notifications
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Denny Anderson
Denny Anderson
10 months ago

Bill great article and thanks for the comments in the voters pamphlet.

Barbara Witt
Barbara Witt
10 months ago

Well said, Bill.

Letha Williams
Letha Williams
10 months ago

Bill, thank you for the cogent and timely op-ed. While I felt like there was a full scale marketing campaign centered on loss of all extracurriculars if the levy does not pass, It was lost on me in the Zoom presentation that this was nearly fully salary driven- that was not, at all, how it was presented to the public. Is the OSPI pre-approval plan available to the public?

Bill Eling
Bill Eling
9 months ago
Reply to  Letha Williams

Letha, I obtained the OSPI Enrichment Levy Pre-Approval Plan through a public records request to HSD. I do not have a link to a public source. I am attempting to find a website that will publish the copy I have. Check back. I may have a link within the next 24 hours. Alternately, the District might respond to a request from you to make the Plan available on HSD’s website and pin it where everyone can see it.

Bill Eling
Bill Eling
9 months ago
Reply to  Bill Eling

Letha, a link to the OSPI pre-approval for Hockinson can be found at Hockinson Levy – Part Deux Updated Feb 1st (swweducation.org) It is at the top of the article. Special thanks to the host of swweducation.org for making it easily available to the public. There is additional Hockinson related commentary at that website.

5
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x