Battle Ground resident Josh Wilde scrutinizes Battle Ground School Board candidate Chris Grewell
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Campaigns built on promises of trust and accountability should model those values in practice. In a recent letter to Clark County Today, James Townley endorsed Chris Grewell for the Battle Ground School Board, arguing that the district needs new leadership. Mr. Townley claimed that Mr. Grewell would “strive to put schools back on the path toward academic excellence rather than lowering standards” and “offer a trustworthy and efficient handling of financial resources.”
Several recent letters of support have praised Mr. Grewell’s project management background and financial acumen. His official statement in the Washington Voters’ Pamphlet cites many of these same qualities and emphasizes a campaign “committed to truth, responsibility, and excellence.” Given these claims, it was surprising to see Mr. Grewell listed by the Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) among candidates who failed to file accurate and timely financial reports as required by law.
I am not an expert, but based on the reports currently available, it appears that Mr. Grewell has reported only two high-dollar donations of $1,200 each and just $10 in total campaign expenses. Could this be accurate? Who is financing this campaign? Where is the money going? If I were a donor, I would have questions. As a voter, I am concerned that this raises the very issues his supporters warned against: a “lowering of standards” and a potentially “[un]trustworthy and [in]efficient handling of financial resources.”
For comparison, none of the other candidates for the Battle Ground School Board appear on the PDC’s noncompliance list. Their filings each appear to include detailed disclosures of donors and itemized expenditures, as required. Whether the apparent discrepancies in Mr. Grewell’s reports result from an honest mistake or a lack of transparency, shouldn’t we expect better from a campaign centered on “executive management,” “fiscal discipline,” and “accountability”?
At this point, the evidence does not seem to match the campaign rhetoric.
Josh Wilde
Battle Ground
Also read:
- Reps. Peter Abbarno and Ed Orcutt: Supplemental capital budget includes key investments for the 20th District
Projects in the 20th District will benefit from millions in state funds, with local schools, community centers, and infrastructure improvements highlighted by Reps. Abbarno and Orcutt. - Opinion: A troubling end to a disruptive session
Let’s Go Washington highlights multiple instances where legislative leaders dismissed historic public feedback, advanced controversial tax policies, and undermined constituent influence. - Opinion: Washington state is blowing up its no-income-tax advantage
Lawmakers advanced SB 6346 with an emergency clause, aiming to end Washington’s no-income-tax reputation and prevent voters from seeking a referendum. - Opinion: Labor to hit households
Households hiring for childcare or cleaning may soon need formal contracts due to a Washington law extending workplace rules to domestic arrangements. - POLL: What do you think will happen if Washington’s new income tax becomes law?
A new poll asks Clark County Today readers to predict what will happen if Washington’s nearly 10% tax on high incomes becomes law.
