Battle Ground resident Josh Wilde scrutinizes Battle Ground School Board candidate Chris Grewell
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Campaigns built on promises of trust and accountability should model those values in practice. In a recent letter to Clark County Today, James Townley endorsed Chris Grewell for the Battle Ground School Board, arguing that the district needs new leadership. Mr. Townley claimed that Mr. Grewell would “strive to put schools back on the path toward academic excellence rather than lowering standards” and “offer a trustworthy and efficient handling of financial resources.”
Several recent letters of support have praised Mr. Grewell’s project management background and financial acumen. His official statement in the Washington Voters’ Pamphlet cites many of these same qualities and emphasizes a campaign “committed to truth, responsibility, and excellence.” Given these claims, it was surprising to see Mr. Grewell listed by the Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) among candidates who failed to file accurate and timely financial reports as required by law.
I am not an expert, but based on the reports currently available, it appears that Mr. Grewell has reported only two high-dollar donations of $1,200 each and just $10 in total campaign expenses. Could this be accurate? Who is financing this campaign? Where is the money going? If I were a donor, I would have questions. As a voter, I am concerned that this raises the very issues his supporters warned against: a “lowering of standards” and a potentially “[un]trustworthy and [in]efficient handling of financial resources.”
For comparison, none of the other candidates for the Battle Ground School Board appear on the PDC’s noncompliance list. Their filings each appear to include detailed disclosures of donors and itemized expenditures, as required. Whether the apparent discrepancies in Mr. Grewell’s reports result from an honest mistake or a lack of transparency, shouldn’t we expect better from a campaign centered on “executive management,” “fiscal discipline,” and “accountability”?
At this point, the evidence does not seem to match the campaign rhetoric.
Josh Wilde
Battle Ground
Also read:
- These new laws and taxes take effect in Washington state on Jan. 1
Several new laws and tax increases passed in 2025 take effect Jan. 1 in Washington, impacting unemployment benefits, business taxes, transportation fees, consumer costs and regulatory requirements. - Opinion: Justice for none – Court hands down a mandate without a dime to fund it
Nancy Churchill argues that a Washington Supreme Court ruling on public defense imposes costly mandates on local governments without providing funding to implement them. - Deportations, tariffs, court clashes, record shutdown mark a historic year in Washington, D.C.
A year marked by deportations, tariffs, court battles, and a record federal shutdown reshaped Washington, D.C., during President Donald Trump’s return to office. - Opinion: The progressive attack on Washington’s sheriffs
Nancy Churchill argues that proposed legislation would shift power over county sheriffs away from voters and concentrate control within state government. - VIDEO: WA GOP budget lead blasts Ferguson’s fiscal plan as ‘a complete joke’
Republican lawmakers sharply criticized Gov. Bob Ferguson’s proposed 2026 supplemental budget, arguing it fails to meet Washington’s four-year balanced budget requirement and masks deeper fiscal problems.
