Ridgefield resident Matthew White addresses the school bond proposal for the April 23 special election
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
As a coach of youth sports in Ridgefield for the past four years, I’ve witnessed firsthand the importance of teamwork, planning, and leadership. In light of recent opposition to the upcoming school bond propositions, I want to address a few misconceptions and emphasize the urgent need for action.

Contrary to claims made in a recent opinion piece, the decision to build the Ridgefield Outdoor Recreation Complex (RORC) where it is was a prudent one, benefiting both the city and the school district. The city funded the complex and parking lots, but the district maintained ownership of the land, which has ensured priority field usage for our student athletes — a win-win for our community.
It was also suggested that this decision has prevented the district from building portables to deal with excess capacity. Nobody plans a school that includes portable farms like we’ve crammed into our existing schools, and nobody wants that. They’re more expensive to maintain in the long run, offer an inferior classroom experience, and are just plain unsightly. They should be treated as short-term band-aids, not long-term capacity solutions.
I have seen firsthand in my coaching experience how easy it is to be a critic on the sidelines who questions every detail of every plan and decision. What’s exponentially more difficult is to be a leader that initiates and implements solutions to big problems. A measure of skepticism is healthy for public discourse but we are well past the point of indecision and incessant criticism. We need leadership that can provide our community with new schools to deal with the pressing enrollment growth and infrastructure challenges we face, and I believe the current leadership of Ridgefield School District is doing just that.
The plans in the bonds we are voting on have been discussed for years and have undergone thorough scrutiny. They also have received unanimous support from the school board and city council. Now is not the time for hesitation or second-guessing. It’s time to invest in our children’s future and provide the educational resources they deserve.
Let’s rally together as a community to support the bond measure. It’s time to act — our children are counting on us. Vote ‘Yes’ on Propositions 10 and 11 and let’s pave the way for excellence in education in Ridgefield.
Matthew White
Ridgefield
Also read:
- Opinion: Transit agencies need accountability not increased state subsidyCharles Prestrud argues that Washington transit agencies face rising costs and declining ridership due to governance structures that lack public accountability.
- Letter: ‘For years, American foreign policy too often felt like a blank check’Vancouver resident Peter Bracchi argues that the 2025 National Security Strategy marks a long-overdue shift toward clearer priorities, shared responsibility, and interest-based American leadership.
- POLL: Are you better off than you were a year ago?This week’s poll asks readers to reflect on their personal financial situation and whether they feel better off than they were a year ago as economic conditions continue to shift.
- Opinion: Does tailgating cause speeding?Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl examines whether tailgating contributes to speeding and explains why following too closely increases crash risk with little benefit.
- Opinion: ‘The Democrats’ part of the bargain’Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance reflects on a New Year’s Eve encounter and a Bill Maher commentary to assess what he sees as cultural and political changes from the past year.








Several comments about the authors statements:
1) Development of the sports center was done without telling the public the new high school wouldn’t be built. Plan and action were different. Is it the fiscal responsibility of the school district to support a public sports complex rather than focus on education?
2) Portables They’re more expensive to maintain in the long run, offer an inferior classroom experience, and are just plain unsightly. That’s simply not true. Here is an article that provides facts about Modular class rooms. The author needs to research and stick to facts. Modulars can be an excellent option. Modular Classrooms – Unsafe or a Smart Choice? (swweducation.org)
The plan for the K4 includes a full size gym and an artificial turf soccer field? For K-4? The intermediate/middle school isn’t needed. More space at the high school is needed. The comments from the public agree that there is need for more space in several areas but also point out that the proposed plans are not cost effective nor what’s needed. Why would taxpayers agree to 21 years of payments for the wrong solutions?
Respectfully, your POV is not developed as someone who works in the school settings and sees the need first-hand.
Portables are not built to withstand constant, long term use. Issues with basic facilities in portables started soon after installation ( ex.: AC not working creating unsafe environment for staff and students on warmer days, ultimately having a negative impact on productivity for students).
We don’t need another 5-8(?) The current schools are having to convert small meeting spaces and gyms into teaching spaces. That’s right now. Where are the new students arriving everyday going to be taught? Take time to spend a single day at any school in the district and you will see the daily struggle. My hope is you will see- through the eyes of the people who work daily to educate and serve within the current, over populated buildings – the desperate need for proper, quality space to teach our community’s students and not continue to rely on desperate, sub par solutions.
Hi Dick, I understand you’re not a Ridgefield resident so these bonds won’t affect you.
Your link about portables uses only portable manufacturers as a source so color me skeptical of their conclusions. Portables get more weather exposure so HVAC ends up costing more all around. They also have about half the life expectancy on average of a permanent building, so as a longer term solution you can see how that becomes problematic and costly due to needed renovations and potential replacement.
As far as the high school not being built, zero bond dollars were used on the RORC, so that certainly wasn’t the problem. After talking to district leaders it sounds like building a new high school was an idea, not a commitment. But for sure it was not committed to with bond dollars, so you may have read wrongly.
I have to agree with Dick Rylanders analysis. Poor decisions were made and now we are repeating history with overspending that doesn’t solve the needs.
If modular buildings were so bad, they wouldn’t be used at all. Even people who live in Ridgefield use them for their home.
Looking back at what my schools had, they didn’t have all the sports amenities but the schools were better than anything Ridgefield is planning.
At this point, a gym membership is cheaper than all the costs we are still paying for and this spending spree.