Camas resident Gary Perman shares his appreciation for the rejection of the proposed utility tax
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Camas voters have spoken, rejecting the proposed utility tax increase to 6% and standing for responsible budgeting. We fully support our police and first responders, but this tax represented an unnecessary financial burden on residents. With already high property taxes and rising fees, Camas must prioritize essential services with existing revenue without resorting to repeated tax increases.
Voters sent a clear message: demand fiscal responsibility and accountability, collect what is owed to our city, and stop passing the consequences of poor financial planning onto taxpayers. Thank you for ensuring Camas remains a safe and fiscally responsible community. Your voice matters!
Gary Perman
Camas
Also read:
- POLL: After hearing state leaders describe the I-5 Bridge as vulnerable in an earthquake, what is your reaction?
State and local leaders describe the I-5 Bridge as structurally at risk but recommend drivers continue crossing it while complex replacement plans unfold. - Opinion: Historical state income tax and another massive operating budget highlight the end of the 2026 legislative session
Rep. John Ley details the passage of a state income tax, an expanding $80 billion budget, and new Clark County infrastructure funding following the 2026 legislative session. - Opinion: Fighting for transparency in Washington government
A recent court decision allows Washington lawmakers broad new secrecy over internal records, as advocates report rising obstacles to government transparency and public engagement. - Opinion: Attacking Democracy in the name of Democracy
Ryan Frost critiques several 2024 legislative bills, warning unchecked Democrat dominance enables policies that erode local accountability, block referenda, and threaten citizen participation. - Opinion: Washington passed an income tax to fund education, then the same majority cut education — and left $700+ million on the table
State officials passed a new income tax to fund education, then approved over $1 billion in cuts—while forgoing $700 million in annual federal scholarships students could have received.
