Vancouver resident Bill Black offers his assessment of Clark County’s environmental plan
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
As Clark County embarks on a bold journey to reshape its environmental footprint, the pace and clarity of this journey have raised significant concerns among its residents. The proposed measures, ranging from planting native vegetation to revolutionizing building codes and transportation systems, are a commendable nod to the urgency of climate action. However, there is a thin line between ambition and overreach, and it appears we might be crossing it.

The rush to green could lead to missteps
The drive to implement sweeping environmental measures by June 2025 is laudable but potentially fraught with risks. This accelerated timeline for a series of profound changes – including solar-ready roofs, electric vehicle infrastructures, and a complete overhaul of the county fleet – lacks the necessary groundwork for such a seismic shift. Without detailed planning and impact assessments, we risk unintended consequences that could undermine the very goals we seek to achieve all while forecasted to happen during a year of a recession.
Vagueness is not a virtue in environmental planning
A critical aspect of any successful environmental policy is its specificity. Terms like ‘reduce’ or ‘enhance’ without clear targets or benchmarks render these policies more “aspirational” than “practical”. We need specific, measurable goals to ensure real progress and to gauge the effectiveness of our initiatives.
The Data Dilemma: Are we flying blind?
Data drives informed decision-making, especially in environmental policy. Yet, the current proposal seems to be a leap of faith rather than a step grounded in local data and analysis. How will these measures specifically impact Clark County? What are the estimated costs and benefits? These questions need clear answers.
Restructuring society needs more than good intentions
The proposed measures are not mere tweaks but a potential overhaul of our societal infrastructure. Such transformative changes demand thorough deliberation and broad consensus. Are we ready to navigate the complexities of this transition, from economic implications to societal adjustments?
A call for responsible action
As a Native American and a lifelong resident of Clark County, I deeply understand the importance of unwavering commitment to environmental stewardship. Our heritage teaches us the value of respecting and protecting the natural world. However, it’s crucial to recognize that without thorough data and research, even well-intentioned actions can sometimes cause more harm than good to the environment we strive to preserve. This commitment must be coupled with a realistic and responsible approach. I urge our county leaders to reconsider the pace and planning of these environmental initiatives. Let’s embark on this green journey with a map and compass, not just with speed and hope.
The stakes are too high to rush into a green future unprepared. Let’s slow down, plan thoroughly, and move forward wisely.
Bill Black
Vancouver
Also read:
- Opinion: The limits for drug-impaired drivingTarget Zero Manager Doug Dahl explains how Washington law defines drug-impaired driving and how officers are trained to recognize impairment beyond alcohol limits.
- Opinion: ‘Please make your voice heard by taking my legislative priorities survey’Rep. John Ley invites Clark County residents to share their views by participating in a legislative priorities survey during the 2026 session.
- POLL: Do the proposed changes to the Clark County Council’s Rules of Procedure suggest the council lacked authority in 2025?A new reader poll asks whether proposed changes to the Clark County Council’s Rules of Procedure indicate the council lacked clear authority during a 2025 board removal.
- Letter: ‘HSD needs to give a detailed line-item accounting of where the last levy went, and of how they plan to use this one’Randall Schultz-Rathbun urges Hockinson School District to provide detailed, transparent accounting of past and proposed levy spending before asking voters for additional funds.
- Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement’s Park & Ride insanityBob Ortblad criticizes the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s proposed Park & Ride garages, arguing the costs are excessive and unlikely to receive federal funding.







